= Brainstorm workshop survey: Beijing 2017 = == Selected comments from attendees == * == Survey results == Number of participants: 40<
>Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)<
>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]]. === Summary === 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm: * Never used: 58% * Some simulation work: 3% * Some experimental work: 35% * Experienced user: 3% 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: 0% * 2: 0% * 3: 23% * 4: 16% * '''5: 58%''' 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class: * Yes: 48% * No: 42% 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for: * EEG: * MEG: * MEG+EEG: * NIRS: * sEEG/ECoG: * Scripting: * Pre-processing: * Visualization of recordings: * Source analysis: * Time-frequency: * Functional connectivity: * Statistics: * Research: * Clinical applications: * Epilepsy: * Baby / infant studies: * Animal studies: == Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. === Comments about the workshop === * '''Good clarity: ''' * Good pace: * Too fast for beginners: === Missing topics and requests === * Group analysis: * More on scripting: * More on statistics: === Missing tools in Brainstorm === *