= Brainstorm workshop survey: Beijing 2017 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
*
== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 40<
>Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)<
>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].
=== Summary ===
1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
* Never used: 58%
* Some simulation work: 3%
* Some experimental work: 35%
* Experienced user: 3%
1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
* 1: 0%
* 2: 0%
* 3: 23%
* 4: 16%
* '''5: 58%'''
1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
* Yes: 48%
* No: 42%
1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
* EEG:
* MEG:
* MEG+EEG:
* NIRS:
* sEEG/ECoG:
* Scripting:
* Pre-processing:
* Visualization of recordings:
* Source analysis:
* Time-frequency:
* Functional connectivity:
* Statistics:
* Research:
* Clinical applications:
* Epilepsy:
* Baby / infant studies:
* Animal studies:
== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
=== Comments about the workshop ===
* '''Good clarity: '''
* Good pace:
* Too fast for beginners:
=== Missing topics and requests ===
* Group analysis:
* More on scripting:
* More on statistics:
=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
*