1827
Comment:
|
1874
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* | * |
Line 6: | Line 6: |
Number of participants: 30<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. | Number of participants: 30<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]]. |
Line 10: | Line 10: |
* Never used: % * Some simulation work: % * Some experimental work: % |
* Never used: 55% * Some simulation work: 22% * Some experimental work: 22% |
Line 17: | Line 17: |
* 3: % * 4: % * '''5: %''' |
* 3: 5% * '''4: 45% ''' * '''5: 55%''' |
Line 21: | Line 21: |
* Yes: % * No: % |
* Yes: 36% * No: 64% |
Line 24: | Line 24: |
* EEG: * MEG: * MEG+EEG: * NIRS: * sEEG/ECoG: * Scripting: * Pre-processing: * Visualization of recordings: * Source analysis: * Time-frequency: * Functional connectivity: * Statistics: * Research: * Clinical applications: * Epilepsy: * Baby / child studies: |
* EEG: 86% * MEG: 18% * MEG+EEG: 9% * NIRS: 5% * sEEG/ECoG: 18% * Scripting: 32% * Pre-processing: 36% * Visualization of recordings: 59% * Source analysis: 73% * Time-frequency: 77% * Functional connectivity: 64% * Statistics: 45% * Research: 36% * Clinical applications: 27% * Epilepsy: 18% * Baby / infant studies: 18% |
Line 47: | Line 47: |
* A bit slow: * Uneven pace: * Need more short breaks: * Too much time on personal questions: * Some advertised topics were not covered: * Need more time / two days: |
* A bit slow: * Uneven pace: * Need more short breaks: * Too much time on personal questions: * Some advertised topics were not covered: * Need more time / two days: |
Line 55: | Line 55: |
* Connectivity: * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): * Interface with command line Matlab: * More on frequency analysis: |
* Connectivity: * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): * Interface with command line Matlab: * More on frequency analysis: |
Line 62: | Line 62: |
* Integration with fMRI: * Realtime processing and display: |
* Integration with fMRI: * Realtime processing and display: |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Geneva 2015
Selected comments from attendees
Survey results
Number of participants: 30
Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 55%
- Some simulation work: 22%
- Some experimental work: 22%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 5%
4: 45%
5: 55%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 36%
- No: 64%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 86%
- MEG: 18%
- MEG+EEG: 9%
- NIRS: 5%
- sEEG/ECoG: 18%
- Scripting: 32%
- Pre-processing: 36%
- Visualization of recordings: 59%
- Source analysis: 73%
- Time-frequency: 77%
- Functional connectivity: 64%
- Statistics: 45%
- Research: 36%
- Clinical applications: 27%
- Epilepsy: 18%
- Baby / infant studies: 18%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity:
Good pace:
- A bit slow:
- Uneven pace:
- Need more short breaks:
- Too much time on personal questions:
- Some advertised topics were not covered:
- Need more time / two days:
Missing topics and requests
- Connectivity:
- EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
- EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
- Interface with command line Matlab:
- More on frequency analysis:
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Integration with fMRI:
- Realtime processing and display: