= Brainstorm workshop survey: Geneva 2015 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 *

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 30<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: 55%
  * Some simulation work: 22%
  * Some experimental work: 22%
  * Experienced user: 0%
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 5%
  * '''4: 45% '''
  * '''5: 55%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: 36%
  * No: 64%
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: 86%
  * MEG: 18%
  * MEG+EEG: 9%
  * NIRS: 5%
  * sEEG/ECoG: 18%
  * Scripting: 32%
  * Pre-processing: 36%
  * Visualization of recordings: 59%
  * Source analysis: 73%
  * Time-frequency: 77%
  * Functional connectivity: 64%
  * Statistics: 45%
  * Research: 36%
  * Clinical applications: 27%
  * Epilepsy: 18%
  * Baby / infant studies: 18%

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Good clarity: '''
 * '''Good pace: '''
 * A bit slow:
 * Uneven pace:
 * Need more short breaks:
 * Too much time on personal questions:
 * Some advertised topics were not covered:
 * Need more time / two days:

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * Connectivity:
 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
 * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
 * Interface with command line Matlab:
 * More on frequency analysis:

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * Integration with fMRI:
 * Realtime processing and display: