= Brainstorm workshop survey: Geneva 2015 = == Selected comments from attendees == * "Thanks very much for this great workshop which I found to be of great clarity" * == Survey results == Number of participants: 30<
>Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)<
>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]]. === Summary === 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm: * Never used: 55% * Some simulation work: 22% * Some experimental work: 22% * Experienced user: 0% 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: 0% * 2: 0% * 3: 5% * '''4: 45% ''' * '''5: 55%''' 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class: * Yes: 36% * No: 64% 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for: * EEG: 86% * MEG: 18% * MEG+EEG: 9% * NIRS: 5% * sEEG/ECoG: 18% * Scripting: 32% * Pre-processing: 36% * Visualization of recordings: 59% * Source analysis: 73% * Time-frequency: 77% * Functional connectivity: 64% * Statistics: 45% * Research: 36% * Clinical applications: 27% * Epilepsy: 18% * Baby / infant studies: 18% == Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. === Comments about the workshop === * '''Good clarity: 5''' * '''Good pace: 5''' * Practice too fast: 2 * Practice too slow: 1 * Lectures too slow: 1 * More time on practice on personal data: 2 * Too much info for beginners: 1 * Need more time / three days: 1 === Missing topics and requests === * Statistics: 4 * Resting state: 1 * Bad channel interpolation: 1 * More connectivity: 2 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): * Interface with command line Matlab: * More on frequency analysis: === Missing tools in Brainstorm === * Advanced ERP analysis: 1 * Tutorial on dipole fitting: 1 * Easier way to batch: 1 * ERP segmentation: 1 * More statistics: 1 * Integration with fMRI: * Realtime processing and display: