= Brainstorm workshop survey: Geneva 2015 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
* "Thanks very much for this great workshop which I found to be of great clarity"
*
== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 30<
>Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)<
>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].
=== Summary ===
1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
* Never used: 55%
* Some simulation work: 22%
* Some experimental work: 22%
* Experienced user: 0%
1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
* 1: 0%
* 2: 0%
* 3: 5%
* '''4: 45% '''
* '''5: 55%'''
1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
* Yes: 36%
* No: 64%
1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
* EEG: 86%
* MEG: 18%
* MEG+EEG: 9%
* NIRS: 5%
* sEEG/ECoG: 18%
* Scripting: 32%
* Pre-processing: 36%
* Visualization of recordings: 59%
* Source analysis: 73%
* Time-frequency: 77%
* Functional connectivity: 64%
* Statistics: 45%
* Research: 36%
* Clinical applications: 27%
* Epilepsy: 18%
* Baby / infant studies: 18%
== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
=== Comments about the workshop ===
* '''Good clarity: 5'''
* '''Good pace: 5'''
* Practice too fast: 2
* Practice too slow: 1
* Lectures too slow: 1
* More time on practice on personal data: 2
* Too much info for beginners: 1
* Need more time / three days: 1
=== Missing topics and requests ===
* Statistics: 4
* Resting state: 1
* Bad channel interpolation: 1
* More connectivity: 2
* EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
* EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
* Interface with command line Matlab:
* More on frequency analysis:
=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
* Advanced ERP analysis: 1
* Tutorial on dipole fitting: 1
* Easier way to batch: 1
* ERP segmentation: 1
* More statistics: 1
* Integration with fMRI:
* Realtime processing and display: