Brainstorm workshop survey: Geneva 2015
Selected comments from attendees
Survey results
Number of participants: 30
Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 55%
- Some simulation work: 22%
- Some experimental work: 22%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 5%
4: 45%
5: 55%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 36%
- No: 64%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- MEG: 1 1 1 1
- MEG+EEG: 1 1
- NIRS: 1
- sEEG/ECoG: 1 1 1 1
- Scripting: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Pre-processing: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Visualization of recordings: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Source analysis: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Time-frequency: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Functional connectivity: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Statistics: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Research: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Clinical applications: 1 1 1 1 1 1
- Epilepsy: 1 1 1 1
- Baby / infant studies: 1 1 1 1
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity:
Good pace:
- A bit slow:
- Uneven pace:
- Need more short breaks:
- Too much time on personal questions:
- Some advertised topics were not covered:
- Need more time / two days:
Missing topics and requests
- Connectivity:
- EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
- EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
- Interface with command line Matlab:
- More on frequency analysis:
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Integration with fMRI:
- Realtime processing and display: