Brainstorm workshop survey: Grenoble 2015

Selected comments from attendees

Survey results

Number of participants: 19
Number of returned documents: 17 (89%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
   • Never used: 53%
   • Some simulation work: 6%
   • Some experimental work: 29%
   • Experienced user: 12%
2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
   • 1: 0%
   • 2: 0%
   • 3: 0%

   • 4: 65%

   • 5: 35%

3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
   • Yes: 47%
   • No: 53%
4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
   • EEG:
   • MEG:
   • MEG+EEG:
   • NIRS:
   • sEEG/ECoG:
   • Scripting:
   • Pre-processing:
   • Visualization of recordings:
   • Source analysis:
   • Time-frequency:
   • Functional connectivity:
   • Statistics:
   • Research:
   • Clinical applications:
   • Epilepsy:
   • Baby / child studies:

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

• Good clarity:

• Good pace:

• A bit slow:
• Uneven pace:
• Need more short breaks:
• Too much time on personal questions:
• Some advertised topics were not covered:
• Need more time / two days:

Missing topics and requests

• Connectivity:
• EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
• EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
• Interface with command line Matlab:
• More on frequency analysis:

Missing tools in Brainstorm

• Integration with fMRI:
• Realtime processing and display: