= Brainstorm workshop survey: Grenoble 2015 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 *

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 19<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 17 (89%)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: 53%
  * Some simulation work: 6%
  * Some experimental work: 29%
  * Experienced user: 12%
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 0%
  * '''4: 65% '''
  * '''5: 35%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: 47%
  * No: 53%
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG:
  * MEG:
  * MEG+EEG:
  * NIRS:
  * sEEG/ECoG:
  * Scripting:
  * Pre-processing:
  * Visualization of recordings:
  * Source analysis:
  * Time-frequency:
  * Functional connectivity:
  * Statistics:
  * Research:
  * Clinical applications:
  * Epilepsy:
  * Baby / child studies:

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Good clarity: '''
 * '''Good pace: '''
 * A bit slow:
 * Uneven pace:
 * Need more short breaks:
 * Too much time on personal questions:
 * Some advertised topics were not covered:
 * Need more time / two days:

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * Connectivity:
 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
 * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
 * Interface with command line Matlab:
 * More on frequency analysis:

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * Integration with fMRI:
 * Realtime processing and display: