2380
Comment:
|
← Revision 7 as of 2015-10-29 20:38:11 ⇥
2108
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* Thank you | * ''"Very clear! The UI and apparent robustness of the software helped a lot with clarity."'' * ''"Well paced, relatively easy to keep pace, even as a beginner user."'' * ''"Lot of information, but well paced."'' * ''"Answered all questions clearly."'' * ''"Excellent!"'' |
Line 40: | Line 44: |
* Real-time DSP/reporting/viz: 5% * fMRI: 5% |
|
Line 47: | Line 49: |
* '''Good clarity:''' '''4''' * '''Good pace: 4''' * A bit slow: 1 * A bit fast: * Need more time / two days: 1 * Some topics were not covered as advertised: 1 |
* '''Good clarity: 16''' * '''Good pace: 12''' * A bit slow: 3 * Uneven pace: 1 * Need more short breaks: 1 * Too much time on personal questions: 1 * Some advertised topics were not covered: 2 * Need more time / two days: 2 |
Line 55: | Line 59: |
* Resting state: * Interface with command line Matlab: 1 * More on statistics: * More on scripting: * More on connectivity: * Group analysis: * PAC: * Filtering: * Writing plugin modules: * Export NIfTI files: |
* Connectivity: 3 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): 3 * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): 3 * Interface with command line Matlab: 2 * More on frequency analysis: 1 |
Line 67: | Line 66: |
* '''Beamforming: ''' * '''More statistics: ''' * Head motion detection and correction: * More connectivity measures: * Child template: == Technical issues == * == Results analysis == === Results encoding === 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA 1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A === Results values === 1. 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 1. 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1. 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 |
* Integration with fMRI: 2 * Realtime processing and display: 2 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Los Angeles 2015
Selected comments from attendees
"Very clear! The UI and apparent robustness of the software helped a lot with clarity."
"Well paced, relatively easy to keep pace, even as a beginner user."
"Lot of information, but well paced."
"Answered all questions clearly."
"Excellent!"
Survey results
Number of participants: 24
Number of returned documents: 19 (79%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 68%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 27%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 10%
- 4: 16%
5: 74%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 68%
- No: 32%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 100%
- MEG: 21%
- MEG+EEG: 10%
- NIRS: 10%
- sEEG/ECoG: 10%
- Scripting: 32%
- Pre-processing: 68%
- Visualization of recordings: 74%
- Source analysis: 68%
- Time-frequency: 63%
- Functional connectivity: 47%
- Statistics: 63%
- Research: 74%
- Clinical applications: 21%
- Epilepsy: 10%
- Baby / child studies: 5%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 16
Good pace: 12
- A bit slow: 3
- Uneven pace: 1
- Need more short breaks: 1
- Too much time on personal questions: 1
- Some advertised topics were not covered: 2
- Need more time / two days: 2
Missing topics and requests
- Connectivity: 3
- EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): 3
- EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): 3
- Interface with command line Matlab: 2
- More on frequency analysis: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Integration with fMRI: 2
- Realtime processing and display: 2