1990
Comment:
|
← Revision 5 as of 2015-06-15 16:39:06 ⇥
2894
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* | * ''"The lectures are very clear and helpful for understanding the workshop"'' * ''"The workshop was very interesting and didactic, the speakers did a great job!"'' * ''"Very interesting lectures and great hands-on time"'' * ''"Excellente formation, très claire et pédagogique!"'' * ''"Très pédagogique et amical"'' * ''"Parfait!"'' |
Line 10: | Line 15: |
* '''Never used: ''' * Some simulation work: * Some experimental work: * Experienced user: |
* Never used: 47% * Some simulation work: 5% * Some experimental work: 48% * Experienced user: 0% (advanced users were present but didn't return the survey) |
Line 15: | Line 20: |
* 1: * 2: * 3: * 4: * '''5: ''' |
* 1: 0% * 2: 0% * 3: 0% * 4: 16% * '''5: ''''''85%''' |
Line 21: | Line 26: |
* Yes: * No: |
* Yes: 74% * No: 26% |
Line 24: | Line 29: |
* EEG: * MEG: * MEG+EEG: * NIRS: * sEEG/ECoG: * Scripting: * Pre-processing: * Visualization of recordings: * Source analysis: * Time-frequency: * Functional connectivity: * Statistics: * Research: * Clinical applications: * Epilepsy: * Baby / child studies: |
* EEG: 79% * MEG: 53% * MEG+EEG: 21% * NIRS: 0% * sEEG/ECoG: 11% * Scripting: 21% * Pre-processing: 47% * Visualization of recordings: 47% * Source analysis: 74% * Time-frequency: 53% * Functional connectivity: 53% * Statistics: 47% * Research: 42% * Clinical applications: 11% * Epilepsy: 5% * Baby / child studies: 0% * TMS: 5% * Electrophysiology: 5% |
Line 45: | Line 52: |
* '''Good clarity: ''' * '''Good pace: ''' * A bit slow: * A bit fast: |
* '''Good clarity: 16''' * '''Good pace: 7''' * A bit dense: 2 * A bit fast: 2 * Breaks should be respected: 1 |
Line 51: | Line 59: |
* Resting state: * More on statistics: * More on scripting: * More on connectivity: |
* '''Group analysis: 5''' * More on statistics: 2 * More on ROIs: 1 |
Line 57: | Line 64: |
* '''Beamforming: ''' * '''More statistics: ''' |
* '''More statistics (ANOVAs, non-parametric, ...): 6''' * '''Links between FieldTrip and Brainstorm: 3''''''''' * Documentation of all the processes options: 2 * Better artifact rejection: 2 * Standard deviation on the averages: 1 * Microstate analysis: 1 * Rasterplots: 1 * Beamformers: 1 * Spatial filters (Laplacian): 1 * More possibilities for overlaying data: 1 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Marseille 2015
Selected comments from attendees
"The lectures are very clear and helpful for understanding the workshop"
"The workshop was very interesting and didactic, the speakers did a great job!"
"Very interesting lectures and great hands-on time"
"Excellente formation, très claire et pédagogique!"
"Très pédagogique et amical"
"Parfait!"
Survey results
Number of participants: 30
Number of returned documents: 19 (63%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 47%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 48%
- Experienced user: 0% (advanced users were present but didn't return the survey)
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 0%
- 4: 16%
5: 85%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 74%
- No: 26%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 79%
- MEG: 53%
- MEG+EEG: 21%
- NIRS: 0%
- sEEG/ECoG: 11%
- Scripting: 21%
- Pre-processing: 47%
- Visualization of recordings: 47%
- Source analysis: 74%
- Time-frequency: 53%
- Functional connectivity: 53%
- Statistics: 47%
- Research: 42%
- Clinical applications: 11%
- Epilepsy: 5%
- Baby / child studies: 0%
- TMS: 5%
- Electrophysiology: 5%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 16
Good pace: 7
- A bit dense: 2
- A bit fast: 2
- Breaks should be respected: 1
Missing topics and requests
Group analysis: 5
- More on statistics: 2
- More on ROIs: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
More statistics (ANOVAs, non-parametric, ...): 6
Links between FieldTrip and Brainstorm: 3
- Documentation of all the processes options: 2
- Better artifact rejection: 2
- Standard deviation on the averages: 1
- Microstate analysis: 1
- Rasterplots: 1
- Beamformers: 1
- Spatial filters (Laplacian): 1
- More possibilities for overlaying data: 1
Technical issues
- Win32 computers: many out of memory errors
Installation of OpenMEEG on MacBooks caused problems
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1
- 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5
- 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1