Brainstorm workshop survey: Marseille 2015
Selected comments from attendees
Survey results
Number of participants: 30
Number of returned documents: 19 (63%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 47%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 48%
- Experienced user: 0% (advanced users were present but didn't return the survey)
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 0%
- 4: 16%
5: 85%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 74%
- No: 26%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 79%
- MEG: 53%
- MEG+EEG: 21%
- NIRS: 0%
- sEEG/ECoG: 11%
- Scripting: 21%
- Pre-processing: 47%
- Visualization of recordings: 47%
- Source analysis: 74%
- Time-frequency: 53%
- Functional connectivity: 53%
- Statistics: 47%
- Research: 42%
- Clinical applications: 11%
- Epilepsy: 5%
- Baby / child studies: 0%
- TMS: 5%
- Electrophysiology: 5%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity:
Good pace:
- A bit slow:
- A bit fast:
Missing topics and requests
- Resting state:
- More on statistics:
- More on scripting:
- More on connectivity:
Missing tools in Brainstorm
Beamforming:
More statistics:
Technical issues
- Win32 computers: many out of memory errors
Installation of OpenMEEG on MacBooks caused problems
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1
- 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5
- 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1