MEG@McGill Training Program 2015: Survey
Full week training to learn everything about MEG: paradigm design, acquisition and advanced data analysis.
Survey results
Number of participants: 12
Number of returned documents: 11 (90%)
Summary
- Overall, how did the training program meet your expectations?
- Poor:
- Fair:
- Good:
- Excellent:
- How would you rate the first day of lectures?
- Poor:
- Fair:
- Good:
- Excellent:
- How would you rate the hands-on part of the program?
- Poor:
- Fair:
- Good:
- Excellent:
- What did you like the best (multiple choice)?
- Support:
- Food:
- Weather:
- Expertise of the team:
- Would you recommend the training to your collaborators and colleagues?
- Yes:
- No:
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 12
Too fast at moments: 8
Too fast in general: 6
Good pace: 5
Too much for one day: 5
- Good structure: 1
- More exercices, less demo: 1
Missing topics and requests
- More discussions on the methods/parameters: 4
- Introduction to MEG: 1
- Theoretical background for all the steps: 1
- Importing pre-processed data: 2
- Export data to other programs: 1
- Combined MEG+EEG: 1
- More on statistics: 3
- More on scripting: 1
- More on source localization: 1
- Better overview of the software interface: 1
- Shorter software introduction: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Interpolation of bad channels: 1
- Real-time analysis: 1
- Statistics: 4
- ICA : 1
- NIRS: 1
- Source estimation of TF data: 1
Technical issues
Out of memory errors with Win 32bit
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
- 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 0 4 5 4 4 4 5 0 4 4 4 4 4
- 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1