= MEG workshop survey: Montreal 2017 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 * ''It was great interacting with the authors and understanding the very many possibilities.''
 * ''Great job!''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 12<<BR>>Number of responses: 7 (58%)

=== Summary - Lecture Day ===
1. Please rate how you found each of the lectures:

 * The physiological origins of scalp signals: Sylvain Baillet:
  * Very useful: 86%
  * Nothing new: 14%
 * Basic signal extraction: ERP/ERFs, Jeremy Moreau
  * Very useful: 86%
  * Somewhat useful: 14%
 * Spectral analysis, Peter Donhauser
  * Very useful: 57%
  * Somewhat useful: 29%
  * No comment: 14%
 * Source imaging 101: Christophe Grova
  * Very useful: 86%
  * Somewhat useful: 14%
 * Keynote : Dimitrios Pantazis
  * Very useful: 72%
  * Somewhat useful: 14%
  * Nothing new: 14%
 * The Functional and Effective Connectivity, Sylvain Baillet
  * Very useful: 72%
  * Somewhat useful: 14%
  * No comment: 14%
 * Applications of MEG and MSI, Jeremy Moreau
  * Very useful: 29%
  * Somewhat useful: 29%
  * Nothing new: 29%
  * No comment: 14%

2. Please rate how you found the poster session:

 * Very useful: 29%
 * Somewhat useful: 57%
 * No comment: 14%

3. How did you like the venue and catered breaks:

 * Met Expectations: 86%
 * Neutral: 14%

=== Summary - Hands-on ===

1. Please rate how you found the lecture: Intro to MEG instrumentation and Paradigm design: Beth Bock
 * Very useful: 86%
 * Somewhat useful: 14%
2. Please rate your experience with paradigm design [Your group]:
 * Excellent: 44%
 * Good: 28%
 * Average: 28%
3. Please rate your experience with paradigm design [Resources (computer, software, etc)]
 * Excellent: 86%
 * Good: 14%
4. Please rate your experience with paradigm design [Expert assistance]
 * Excellent: 100%
5. Please rate your experience with paradigm design [Time]
 * Excellent: 44%
 * Good: 44%
 * Average: 12%
6. Please rate your experience with data recording [Beth's instructions]
 * Excellent: 100%
7. Please rate your experience with data recording [Time]
 * Excellent: 86%
 * Average: 14%
8. Please rate your experience with data analysis [Francois' instructions]
 * Excellent: 100%
9. Please rate your experience with data analysis [Resources (computer, software, etc)]
 * Excellent: 100%
10. Please rate your experience with data analysis [Expert assistance]
 * Excellent: 86%
 * Good: 14%
11. Please rate your experience with data analysis [Time]
 * Excellent: 72%
 * Good: 14%
 * Average: 14%
12. How did you like the venue and catered breaks?
 * Met Expectations: 86%
 * Neutral: 14%
13. Would you recommend the course to your colleagues?
 * Yes: 100%