⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2014-06-05 17:39:06
2171
Comment:
|
3288
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* | * "Very good!" * "It was very very clear and the pace of explanations and hands-on sessions were perfect." * "More topics than expected were covered well, I was surprised and very much satisfied." * "Really, thank you so much, I truely appreciated this precious opportunity." * |
Line 10: | Line 14: |
* Never used: * Some simulation work: * Some experimental work: * Experienced user: |
* Never used: '''66%''' * Some simulation work: 0% * Some experimental work: 32% * Experienced user: 0% |
Line 17: | Line 21: |
* 3: * 4: * 5: |
* 3: 13% * 4: '''53%''' * 5: '''21%''' |
Line 21: | Line 25: |
* Yes: * No: * N/A: |
* Yes: 42% * No: 39% * N/A: 18% |
Line 25: | Line 29: |
* EEG: * MEG: * MEG+EEG: * NIRS: * sEEG/ECoG: * Scripting: * Pre-processing: * Visualization of recordings: * Source analysis: * Time-frequency: * Functional connectivity: * Statistics: * Research: * Clinical applications: * Epilepsy: * Baby / infant studies: |
* EEG: '''37%''' * MEG: '''84%''' * MEG+EEG: 24% * NIRS: 18% * sEEG/ECoG: 18% * Scripting: 13% * Pre-processing: 16% * Visualization of recordings: 18% * Source analysis: '''37%''' * Time-frequency: '''39%''' * Functional connectivity: '''53%''' * Statistics: 16% * Research: '''37%''' * Clinical applications: '''32%''' * Epilepsy: 21% * Baby / infant studies: 8% |
Line 46: | Line 50: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: ''' * A bit too fast in general: * Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days: * Too advanced, not enough theory: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 10''' * '''Too fast in general: 8''' * '''Too fast in the afternoon: 4''' * Too slow in the morning: 2 * Difficult to catch up after a problem: 1 * Screen was too small: 1 * English was a problem: 1 |
Line 52: | Line 59: |
* Processing EEG data / ERPs: * More on forward/inverse modeling: * Source estimation in time-frequecy domain: * PLV connectivity: |
* '''More on connectivity/causality analysis: 7''' * '''Cross-frequency coupling: 4''' * Statistics: 2 * More scripting: 2 * Compare results from multiple subjects: 1 * Resting state analysis: 1 * More analysis in source space (less sensor data): 1 |
Line 58: | Line 68: |
* Development of the functional connectivity: * Cross-frequency phase synchronization: |
* '''Development of the functional connectivity: 5''' * Dynamic causal modeling: 1 * Phase locking factor: 1 * Phase-phase coupling: 1 * Beamformers: 1 * Source localization with Champagne algorithm (Owen 2012): 1 * Import SPM/fMRI data: 2 * Support for NIRS: 1 * Creating electrodes maps for ECoG/SEEG: 1 * Define scouts in MNI coordinates: 1 * Other brain models (infants, child, aged): 1 * Graph analysis: 1 * Request for tutorials in Japanese: 1 |
Line 62: | Line 83: |
* Tree not displaying well (refresh required): * Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy: * Tree not displaying at all: * Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects: |
* '''Scout not selected on the correct surface or not displayed: 10 ''' |
Line 74: | Line 92: |
1. 1. 1. |
1. 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1. 4 5 4 4 0 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 0 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 3 4 4 4 5 5 0 4 3 4 4 3 4 1. 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Osaka 2014
Selected comments from attendees:
- "Very good!"
- "It was very very clear and the pace of explanations and hands-on sessions were perfect."
- "More topics than expected were covered well, I was surprised and very much satisfied."
- "Really, thank you so much, I truely appreciated this precious opportunity."
Survey results
Number of participants: 70
Number of returned documents: 38 (51%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 66%
- Some simulation work: 0%
- Some experimental work: 32%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 13%
4: 53%
5: 21%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 42%
- No: 39%
- N/A: 18%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 37%
MEG: 84%
- MEG+EEG: 24%
- NIRS: 18%
- sEEG/ECoG: 18%
- Scripting: 13%
- Pre-processing: 16%
- Visualization of recordings: 18%
Source analysis: 37%
Time-frequency: 39%
Functional connectivity: 53%
- Statistics: 16%
Research: 37%
Clinical applications: 32%
- Epilepsy: 21%
- Baby / infant studies: 8%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 10
Too fast in general: 8
Too fast in the afternoon: 4
- Too slow in the morning: 2
- Difficult to catch up after a problem: 1
- Screen was too small: 1
- English was a problem: 1
Missing topics and requests
More on connectivity/causality analysis: 7
Cross-frequency coupling: 4
- Statistics: 2
- More scripting: 2
- Compare results from multiple subjects: 1
- Resting state analysis: 1
- More analysis in source space (less sensor data): 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
Development of the functional connectivity: 5
- Dynamic causal modeling: 1
- Phase locking factor: 1
- Phase-phase coupling: 1
- Beamformers: 1
- Source localization with Champagne algorithm (Owen 2012): 1
- Import SPM/fMRI data: 2
- Support for NIRS: 1
- Creating electrodes maps for ECoG/SEEG: 1
- Define scouts in MNI coordinates: 1
- Other brain models (infants, child, aged): 1
- Graph analysis: 1
- Request for tutorials in Japanese: 1
Technical issues
Scout not selected on the correct surface or not displayed: 10
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3
- 4 5 4 4 0 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 0 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 3 4 4 4 5 5 0 4 3 4 4 3 4
- 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 2