Brainstorm workshop survey: Pittsburgh 2016

Selected comments from attendees

• "Excellent overall"

• "Very clear instructions, well paced"

• "Very clear, few presentations make a good link between mathematics and the clinical point of view"

• "I found very useful the combination between theory behind the tool and tutorial on how to use it"

Survey results

Number of participants during the first day: 18
Number of participants during the second day: 10
Number of returned documents: 9 (90%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:

   • Never used: %

   • Some simulation work: %
   • Some experimental work: %
   • Experienced user: %
2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
   • 1: %
   • 2: %
   • 3: %

   • 4: %

   • 5: %

3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
   • Yes: %
   • No: %
4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
   • EEG:
   • MEG:
   • MEG+EEG:
   • NIRS:
   • sEEG/ECoG:
   • Scripting:
   • Pre-processing:
   • Visualization of recordings:
   • Source analysis:
   • Time-frequency:
   • Functional connectivity:
   • Statistics:
   • Research:
   • Clinical applications:
   • Epilepsy:
   • Baby / infant studies:
   • Animal studies:

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

• Good clarity:

• Good pace:
• Too fast for beginners:

Missing topics and requests

• Group analysis:
• More on scripting:
• More on statistics:

Missing tools in Brainstorm

1 1 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 4 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 0 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 5 3 5 5 5 4 3 5 3 4 3 5 5 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 1 1