= Brainstorm workshop survey: Pittsburgh 2016 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 * ''"Excellent overall" ''
 * ''"Very clear instructions, well paced"''
 * ''"Very clear, few presentations make a good link between mathematics and the clinical point of view" ''
 * ''"I found very useful the combination between theory behind the tool and tutorial on how to use it" ''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants during the first day: 18<<BR>>Number of participants during the second day: 10<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 9 (90%)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: '''%'''
  * Some simulation work: %
  * Some experimental work: %
  * Experienced user: %
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: %
  * 2: %
  * 3: %
  * '''4: % '''
  * '''5: %'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: %
  * No: %
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG:
  * MEG: 
  * MEG+EEG: 
  * NIRS: 
  * sEEG/ECoG: 
  * Scripting: 
  * Pre-processing: 
  * Visualization of recordings: 
  * Source analysis: 
  * Time-frequency: 
  * Functional connectivity: 
  * Statistics: 
  * Research: 
  * Clinical applications: 
  * Epilepsy: 
  * Baby / infant studies: 
  * Animal studies: 

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Good clarity: '''
 * Good pace: 
 * Too fast for beginners: 

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * Group analysis: 
 * More on scripting: 
 * More on statistics: 

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * 

1 1 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 4 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 0 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 5 3 5 5 5 4 3 5 3 4 3 5 5 
2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 1 1