⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2014-06-05 17:39:57
2172
Comment:
|
← Revision 2 as of 2014-06-05 23:39:22 ⇥
3343
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* | * ''"I've never used Brainstorm before the workshop, however the explanation and demonstration are easy to follow! Thanks!"'' * ''"This lecture was very helpful and the speaker has made operations clear."'' * ''"Very clear description step by step."'' * ''"Excellent course."'' * ''"Friendly UI design."'' |
Line 6: | Line 10: |
Number of participants: '''65'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''47''' (72%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. | Number of participants: '''65'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''48''' (74%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. |
Line 10: | Line 14: |
* Never used: * Some simulation work: * Some experimental work: * Experienced user: |
* Never used:''' 77%''' * Some simulation work: 2% * Some experimental work: 19% * Experienced user: 2% |
Line 16: | Line 20: |
* 2: 0% * 3: * 4: * 5: |
* 2: 2% * 3: 10% * 4: '''46%''' * 5: '''42%''' |
Line 21: | Line 25: |
* Yes: * No: * N/A: |
* Yes: 17% * No: 46% * N/A: 38% |
Line 25: | Line 29: |
* EEG: * MEG: * MEG+EEG: * NIRS: * sEEG/ECoG: * Scripting: * Pre-processing: * Visualization of recordings: * Source analysis: * Time-frequency: * Functional connectivity: * Statistics: * Research: * Clinical applications: * Epilepsy: * Baby / infant studies: |
* EEG: '''85%''' * MEG: '''74%''' * MEG+EEG: '''40%''' * NIRS: 9% * sEEG/ECoG: 0% * Scripting: 9% * Pre-processing: '''57%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''36%''' * Source analysis: '''70%''' * Time-frequency: '''60%''' * Functional connectivity: '''64%''' * Statistics: '''53%''' * Research: '''49%''' * Clinical applications: 13% * Epilepsy: 2% * Baby / infant studies: 6% |
Line 46: | Line 50: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: ''' * A bit too fast in general: * Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days: * Too advanced, not enough theory: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 21 ''' * '''Too fast in the afternoon: 4''' * To slow in the morning: 1 * Too dense, too much information: 1 * Request for having printouts: 2 * More explicit hardware specifications should be given: 1 |
Line 52: | Line 58: |
* Processing EEG data / ERPs: * More on forward/inverse modeling: * Source estimation in time-frequecy domain: * PLV connectivity: |
* More on forward/inverse modeling: 1 * Realistic head models: 1 * More theory for each step: 1 * Group analysis and statistics: 1 * EEG/ERP analysis: 2 * Clinical case: 1 * Resting state MEG: 1 * How to open other file formats: 1 * Comparison with other similar programs: 1 * Export to SPM: 1 |
Line 58: | Line 70: |
* Development of the functional connectivity: * Cross-frequency phase synchronization: |
* '''More statistics (ANOVA...): 3''' * Equivalent current dipoles: 2 * Dynamic causal modeling: 1 * Development of the functional connectivity:1 * How to integrate fMRI to guide source analysis: 2 * Exchange with !FieldTrip and EEGLAB: 1 * Support for NeuroSky chip data: 1 * NIRS support: 1 * Graph theory analysis: 1 |
Line 62: | Line 81: |
* Tree not displaying well (refresh required): * Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy: * Tree not displaying at all: * Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects: |
* Computer too slow / out of memory / crashes: 3 * More explicit hardware specifications should be given: 1 |
Line 74: | Line 91: |
1. 1. 1. |
1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1. 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 3 5 5 4 5 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 1. 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Taipei 2014
Selected comments from attendees:
"I've never used Brainstorm before the workshop, however the explanation and demonstration are easy to follow! Thanks!"
"This lecture was very helpful and the speaker has made operations clear."
"Very clear description step by step."
"Excellent course."
"Friendly UI design."
Survey results
Number of participants: 65
Number of returned documents: 48 (74%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 77%
- Some simulation work: 2%
- Some experimental work: 19%
- Experienced user: 2%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 2%
- 3: 10%
4: 46%
5: 42%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 17%
- No: 46%
- N/A: 38%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 85%
MEG: 74%
MEG+EEG: 40%
- NIRS: 9%
- sEEG/ECoG: 0%
- Scripting: 9%
Pre-processing: 57%
Visualization of recordings: 36%
Source analysis: 70%
Time-frequency: 60%
Functional connectivity: 64%
Statistics: 53%
Research: 49%
- Clinical applications: 13%
- Epilepsy: 2%
- Baby / infant studies: 6%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 21
Too fast in the afternoon: 4
- To slow in the morning: 1
- Too dense, too much information: 1
- Request for having printouts: 2
- More explicit hardware specifications should be given: 1
Missing topics and requests
- More on forward/inverse modeling: 1
- Realistic head models: 1
- More theory for each step: 1
- Group analysis and statistics: 1
- EEG/ERP analysis: 2
- Clinical case: 1
- Resting state MEG: 1
- How to open other file formats: 1
- Comparison with other similar programs: 1
- Export to SPM: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
More statistics (ANOVA...): 3
- Equivalent current dipoles: 2
- Dynamic causal modeling: 1
- Development of the functional connectivity:1
- How to integrate fMRI to guide source analysis: 2
Exchange with FieldTrip and EEGLAB: 1
Support for NeuroSky chip data: 1
- NIRS support: 1
- Graph theory analysis: 1
Technical issues
- Computer too slow / out of memory / crashes: 3
- More explicit hardware specifications should be given: 1
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 1
- 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 3 5 5 4 5 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 3 4 4
- 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2