Brainstorm workshop survey: Taipei 2014
Selected comments from attendees:
Survey results
Number of participants: 65
Number of returned documents: 47 (72%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used:
- Some simulation work:
- Some experimental work:
- Experienced user:
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3:
- 4:
- 5:
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes:
- No:
- N/A:
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG:
- MEG:
- MEG+EEG:
- NIRS:
- sEEG/ECoG:
- Scripting:
- Pre-processing:
- Visualization of recordings:
- Source analysis:
- Time-frequency:
- Functional connectivity:
- Statistics:
- Research:
- Clinical applications:
- Epilepsy:
- Baby / infant studies:
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity:
- A bit too fast in general:
- Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days:
- Too advanced, not enough theory:
Missing topics and requests
- Processing EEG data / ERPs:
- More on forward/inverse modeling:
- Source estimation in time-frequecy domain:
- PLV connectivity:
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Development of the functional connectivity:
- Cross-frequency phase synchronization:
Technical issues
- Tree not displaying well (refresh required):
- Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy:
- Tree not displaying at all:
- Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects:
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A