= Brainstorm workshop survey: Taipei 2014 = == Selected comments from attendees: == * == Survey results == Number of participants: '''65'''<
>Number of returned documents: '''47''' (72%)<
>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. === Summary === 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm: * Never used: * Some simulation work: * Some experimental work: * Experienced user: 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: 0% * 2: 0% * 3: * 4: * 5: 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class: * Yes: * No: * N/A: 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for: * EEG: * MEG: * MEG+EEG: * NIRS: * sEEG/ECoG: * Scripting: * Pre-processing: * Visualization of recordings: * Source analysis: * Time-frequency: * Functional connectivity: * Statistics: * Research: * Clinical applications: * Epilepsy: * Baby / infant studies: == Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. === Comments about the workshop === * '''Good pace and clarity: ''' * A bit too fast in general: * Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days: * Too advanced, not enough theory: === Missing topics and requests === * Processing EEG data / ERPs: * More on forward/inverse modeling: * Source estimation in time-frequecy domain: * PLV connectivity: === Missing tools in Brainstorm === * Development of the functional connectivity: * Cross-frequency phase synchronization: == Technical issues == * Tree not displaying well (refresh required): * Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy: * Tree not displaying at all: * Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects: == Results analysis == === Results encoding === 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA 1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A === Results values === 1. 1. 1.