= Brainstorm workshop survey: Taipei 2014 =
== Selected comments from attendees: ==
*
== Survey results ==
Number of participants: '''65'''<
>Number of returned documents: '''47''' (72%)<
>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].
=== Summary ===
1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
* Never used:
* Some simulation work:
* Some experimental work:
* Experienced user:
1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
* 1: 0%
* 2: 0%
* 3:
* 4:
* 5:
1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
* Yes:
* No:
* N/A:
1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
* EEG:
* MEG:
* MEG+EEG:
* NIRS:
* sEEG/ECoG:
* Scripting:
* Pre-processing:
* Visualization of recordings:
* Source analysis:
* Time-frequency:
* Functional connectivity:
* Statistics:
* Research:
* Clinical applications:
* Epilepsy:
* Baby / infant studies:
== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
=== Comments about the workshop ===
* '''Good pace and clarity: '''
* A bit too fast in general:
* Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days:
* Too advanced, not enough theory:
=== Missing topics and requests ===
* Processing EEG data / ERPs:
* More on forward/inverse modeling:
* Source estimation in time-frequecy domain:
* PLV connectivity:
=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
* Development of the functional connectivity:
* Cross-frequency phase synchronization:
== Technical issues ==
* Tree not displaying well (refresh required):
* Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy:
* Tree not displaying at all:
* Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects:
== Results analysis ==
=== Results encoding ===
1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
=== Results values ===
1.
1.
1.