= Brainstorm workshop survey: Talca, Chile 2018 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
* ''The workshop was excellent. ''
* ''A steady pace with a good mixture of theory and practice.''
* ''Excelente curso. Muy claro y profundo con supuestos teoricos y practicos. Felicitaciones! ''
== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 25<
>Number of returned documents: 12<
>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].
=== Summary ===
1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
* Never used: '''58%'''
* Some simulation work: 8%
* Some experimental work: 33%
* Experienced user: 0%
1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
* 1: 0%
* 2: 0%
* 3: 0%
* 4: 25%
* 5: '''75%'''
1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
* Yes: 33%
* No: 67%
1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
* EEG: 92%
* MEG: 8%
* MEG+EEG: 0%
* NIRS: 17%
* sEEG/ECoG: 0%
* Scripting: 17%
* Pre-processing: 50%
* Visualization of recordings: 50%
* Source analysis: 58%
* Time-frequency: 67%
* Functional connectivity: 58%
* Statistics: 67%
* Research: 50%
* Clinical applications: 17%
* Epilepsy: 0%
* Baby / infant studies: 17%
== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
=== Comments about the workshop ===
* Good clarity: 8
* Good pace: 4
* Sometimes too fast: 4
* More time on advanced topics: 2
* Better in a lab with faster computers: 1
=== Missing topics and requests ===
* EEG topics
* In-depth time frequency
* Complex experimental paradigms
* Segmentation
=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
* More advanced statistics
* Processing complementary psychophysical or peripheral data
* Fractality and nonlinear models
* Electromyogram (EMG)
* Network metrics for connectivity graph