2579
Comment:
|
2720
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
== Selected comments from attendees == * "I think everything I wanted to learn about was covered!" * "Clear and concise" * "Very clear, lots of info" * "Pace was perfect, enough time to try and understand what we were looking at" * "Amazing job!" |
|
Line 3: | Line 10: |
Number of participants: 40<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 27 (90%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. | Number of participants: 40<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 28 (70%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. |
Line 7: | Line 14: |
* Never used: '''78%''' * Some simulation work: 4% * Some experimental work: 18% |
* '''Never used: 86%''' * Some simulation work: 7% * Some experimental work: 7% |
Line 14: | Line 21: |
* 3: 11% * 4: '''63%''' * 5: 18% |
* 3: 0% * 4: 32% * '''5: 68%''' |
Line 18: | Line 25: |
* Yes: 37% * No: 51% * N/A: 11% |
* Yes: 21% * No: 71% |
Line 22: | Line 28: |
* EEG: 89% * MEG: 41% |
* EEG: 36% * MEG: 96% |
Line 25: | Line 31: |
* NIRS: 18% * sEEG/ECoG: 11% * Scripting: 26% * Pre-processing: 37% * Visualization of recordings: 41% * Source analysis: 86% * Time-frequency: 63% * Functional connectivity: 44% * Statistics: 22% * Research: 59% * Clinical applications: 7% * Epilepsy: 0% * Baby / infant studies: 0% * BCI: 4% |
* NIRS: 4% * sEEG/ECoG: 14% * Scripting: 25% * Pre-processing: 75% * Visualization of recordings: 64% * Source analysis: 68% * Time-frequency: 64% * Functional connectivity: 60% * Statistics: 36% * Research: 71% * Clinical applications: 29% * Epilepsy: 21% * Baby / child studies: 11% |
Line 44: | Line 49: |
* '''Good clarity: 12''' * '''Too fast at moments: 8 ''' * '''Too fast in general: 6''' * '''Good pace: 5 ''' * '''Too much for one day: 5 ''' * Good structure: 1 * More exercices, less demo: 1 |
* '''Good clarity: 20''' * '''Good pace: 16<<BR>>''' * A bit slow: 4 * A bit fast: 2 * Need more time: 2 * Time-frequency/connectivity part could be improved: 1 * Handouts more detailed: 1 |
Line 53: | Line 58: |
* More discussions on the methods/parameters: 4 * Introduction to MEG: 1 * Theoretical background for all the steps: 1 * Importing pre-processed data: 2 * Export data to other programs: 1 * Combined MEG+EEG: 1 * More on statistics: 3 |
* Resting state: 2 * More on statistics: 2 |
Line 61: | Line 61: |
* More on source localization: 1 * Better overview of the software interface: 1 * Shorter software introduction: 1 |
* More on connectivity: 1 * Group analysis: 1 * PAC: 1 * Filtering: 1 * Writing plugin modules: 1 * Export NIfTI files: 1 |
Line 66: | Line 69: |
* Interpolation of bad channels: 1 * Real-time analysis: 1 * Statistics: 4 * ICA : 1 * NIRS: 1 * Source estimation of TF data: 1 |
* '''Beamforming: 8''' * '''More statistics: 4''' * Head motion detection and correction: 2 * More connectivity measures: 2 * Child template: 1 |
Line 74: | Line 76: |
* '''Out of memory errors with Win 32bit''' | * One win64 computer crashing randomly with 2014b compiled, working with 2012b compiled * Packaged binaries: missing scripts |
Line 83: | Line 86: |
1. 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 0 4 5 4 4 4 5 0 4 4 4 4 4 1. 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 |
1. 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 1. 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 1. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Toronto 2015
Selected comments from attendees
- "I think everything I wanted to learn about was covered!"
- "Clear and concise"
- "Very clear, lots of info"
- "Pace was perfect, enough time to try and understand what we were looking at"
- "Amazing job!"
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 28 (70%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 86%
- Some simulation work: 7%
- Some experimental work: 7%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 0%
- 4: 32%
5: 68%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 21%
- No: 71%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 36%
- MEG: 96%
- MEG+EEG: 18%
- NIRS: 4%
- sEEG/ECoG: 14%
- Scripting: 25%
- Pre-processing: 75%
- Visualization of recordings: 64%
- Source analysis: 68%
- Time-frequency: 64%
- Functional connectivity: 60%
- Statistics: 36%
- Research: 71%
- Clinical applications: 29%
- Epilepsy: 21%
- Baby / child studies: 11%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 20
Good pace: 16
- A bit slow: 4
- A bit fast: 2
- Need more time: 2
- Time-frequency/connectivity part could be improved: 1
- Handouts more detailed: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Resting state: 2
- More on statistics: 2
- More on scripting: 1
- More on connectivity: 1
- Group analysis: 1
- PAC: 1
- Filtering: 1
- Writing plugin modules: 1
- Export NIfTI files: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
Beamforming: 8
More statistics: 4
- Head motion detection and correction: 2
- More connectivity measures: 2
- Child template: 1
Technical issues
- One win64 computer crashing randomly with 2014b compiled, working with 2012b compiled
- Packaged binaries: missing scripts
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1
- 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5
- 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1