Brainstorm workshop survey: Toronto 2015
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 27 (90%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used:
- Some simulation work:
- Some experimental work:
- Experienced user:
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1:
- 2:
- 3:
- 4:
- 5:
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes:
- No:
- N/A:
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG:
- MEG:
- MEG+EEG:
- NIRS:
- sEEG/ECoG:
- Scripting:
- Pre-processing:
- Visualization of recordings:
- Source analysis:
- Time-frequency:
- Functional connectivity:
- Statistics:
- Research:
- Clinical applications:
- Epilepsy:
- Baby / infant studies:
- BCI:
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity:
Too fast at moments
Too fast in general:
Good pace:
Too much for one day:
Missing topics and requests
- More discussions on the methods/parameters:
- Introduction to MEG:
- Theoretical background for all the steps:
- Importing pre-processed data:
- Export data to other programs:
- Combined MEG+EEG:
- More on statistics:
- More on scripting:
- More on source localization:
- Better overview of the software interface:
- Shorter software introduction:
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Interpolation of bad channels:
- Real-time analysis:
- Statistics:
- ICA :
- NIRS:
- Source estimation of TF data:
Technical issues
- One win64 computer crashing randomly with 2014b compiled, working with 2012b compiled
- Packaged binaries: missing scripts
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A