Tutorial 16: Average response

Authors: Francois Tadel, Elizabeth Bock, Sylvain Baillet

All the epochs we have imported in the previous tutorial are represented by matrices that have the same size (same number of channels, same number of time points), therefore they can be averaged together by experimental condition. The result is called indifferently "evoked response", "average response", "event-related field" in MEG (ERF) or "event-related potential" in EEG (ERP). It shows the components of the brain signals that are strictly time-locked to the presentation of a stimulus.

Average trials separately

We will now compute the average responses for both the "standard" and "deviant" conditions, for each acquisition run separately. Note that in MEG, it is not recommended to average across acquisition runs which correspond to different head positions (ie. different "channel files"). If the head of the subject moved between two blocks of recordings, one sensor does not record the same part of the brain before and after, therefore the runs cannot be compared directly.

Process options

Description of all the options of the process:

Visual exploration

The average response contains interesting information about the early brain operations that occur shortly after the presentation of the stimulus. We can explore two dimensions: the location of the various brain regions involved in the sensory processing and the precise timing of their activation. Because those two types of information are of equal interest, we are typically explore the recordings with two figures at the same time, one that shows all the signals in time, one that shows that spatial distribution at one time.

Add a spatial view:

Repeat the same operations for Run#02:

Interpretation

Let's display the two conditions "standard" and "deviant" side-by-side, for Run#01.

The legend in blue shows names often used in the EEG ERP litterature:

Advanced

Averaging across runs

As said previously, it is usually not recommended to average recordings in sensor space across multiple acquisition runs because the subject might have moved between the sessions. Different head positions were recorded for each run, we will reconstruct the sources separately for each each run to take into account those movements.

However, in the case of event-related studies it makes sense to start our data exploration with an average across runs, just to evaluate the quality of the evoked responses. We have seen in tutorial #4 that the subject almost didn't move between the two runs, so the error would be minimal.

We will compute now an approximate sensor average between runs, then we will run a more formal average in source space later.

Advanced

Standard error








Feedback: Comments, bug reports, suggestions, questions
Email address (if you expect an answer):


Tutorials/Averaging (last edited 2015-07-13 21:43:22 by FrancoisTadel)