Brainstorm workshop survey: Beijing 2017

Selected comments from attendees

Survey results

Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

  1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
    • Never used: 58%

    • Some simulation work: 3%
    • Some experimental work: 35%
    • Experienced user: 3%
  2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 23%
    • 4: 16%
    • 5: 58%

  3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
    • Yes: 48%
    • No: 42%
  4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
    • EEG: 68%
    • MEG: 74%
    • MEG+EEG: 22%
    • NIRS: 3%
    • sEEG/ECoG: 22%
    • Scripting: 16%
    • Pre-processing: 61%
    • Visualization of recordings: 39%
    • Source analysis: 65%
    • Time-frequency: 65%
    • Functional connectivity: 52%
    • Statistics: 39%
    • Research: 35%
    • Clinical applications: 16%
    • Epilepsy: 16%
    • Baby / infant studies: 3%
    • Animal studies: 0%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

Missing topics and requests

Missing tools in Brainstorm

WorkshopBeijing2017Survey (last edited 2017-04-12 12:29:36 by FrancoisTadel)