Brainstorm workshop survey: Concordia 2018

Selected comments from attendees

Survey results

Number of participants: 60
Number of filled surveys: 20

Summary

  1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
    • Never used: 55%

    • Some simulation work: 5%
    • Some experimental work: 35%
    • Experienced user: 5%
  2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 20%
    • 4: 55%

    • 5: 25%
  3. How was the clarity of the presentation: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 15%
    • 4: 50%

    • 5: 35%
  4. How was the pace of the presentation:
    • Way too slow: 0%
    • A bit too slow: 0%
    • Good pace: 50%

    • A bit too fast: 50%

    • Way too fast: 0%
  5. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
    • Yes: 25%
    • No: 75%

  6. If applicable, how would you rate the online tutorial: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 22.2%
    • 4: 44.4%

    • 5: 33.3%
  7. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
    • EEG: 100%
    • MEG: 35%
    • MEG+EEG: 30%
    • NIRS: 30%
    • sEEG/ECoG: 10%
    • Scripting: 15%
    • Pre-processing: 25%
    • Visualization of recordings: 25%
    • Source analysis: 40%
    • Time-frequency: 30%
    • Functional connectivity: 30%
    • Statistics: 20%
    • Research: 30%
    • Clinical applications: 5%
    • Epilepsy: 20%
    • Baby / infant studies: 5%
    • Aging: 5%

Suggestions

Missing topics and requests

Missing tools in Brainstorm

WorkshopConcordia2018Survey (last edited 2018-05-16 14:36:19 by ?MartinCousineau)