= Brainstorm workshop survey: Concordia 2018 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 * ''Very clear and helpful explanations. ''
 * ''It was great. ''
 * ''I really would like to thank the organizers. Bravo.''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 60<<BR>>Number of filled surveys: 20

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: '''55%'''

  * Some simulation work: 5%
  * Some experimental work: 35%
  * Experienced user: 5%

 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 20%
  * 4: '''55%'''

  * 5: 25%

 1. How was the clarity of the presentation: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 15%
  * 4: '''50%'''

  * 5: 35%

 1. How was the pace of the presentation:
  * Way too slow: 0%
  * A bit too slow: 0%
  * Good pace: '''50%'''

  * A bit too fast: '''50%'''

  * Way too fast: 0%

 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: 25%
  * No: '''75%'''

 1. If applicable, how would you rate the online tutorial: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 22.2%
  * 4: '''44.4%'''

  * 5: 33.3%

 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: 100%
  * MEG: 35%
  * MEG+EEG: 30%
  * NIRS: 30%
  * sEEG/ECoG: 10%
  * Scripting: 15%
  * Pre-processing: 25%
  * Visualization of recordings: 25%
  * Source analysis: 40%
  * Time-frequency: 30%
  * Functional connectivity: 30%
  * Statistics: 20%
  * Research: 30%
  * Clinical applications: 5%
  * Epilepsy: 20%
  * Baby / infant studies: 5%
  * Aging: 5%

== Suggestions ==
=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * Explanation on experimental paradigm.
 * How to import data preprocessed with other software.

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * More time-series options for oscillatory patterns.