= Brainstorm workshop survey: Florence 2013 =
== Selected comments from attendees: ==
 * "Lots of information in a short time, but very clear anyway"
 * "Thanks, nice workshop"

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''14 '''(35%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: '''57%'''
  * Some simulation work: 21%
  * Some experimental work: 14%
  * Experienced user:''' '''7%
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 7%
  * 4: '''43%'''
  * 5: '''50%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: '''42%'''
  * No: 29%
  * N/A: 29%
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: '''92%'''
  * MEG: 14%
  * MEG+EEG: 7%
  * NIRS: 7%
  * sEEG/ECoG: 0%
  * Scripting: 21%
  * Pre-processing: '''29%'''
  * Visualization of recordings: '''36%'''
  * Source analysis:  '''64%'''
  * Time-frequency: '''57%'''
  * Functional connectivity: '''64%'''
  * Statistics:''' 29%'''
  * Research:''' 57%'''
  * Clinical applications: '''29%'''
  * Epilepsy: 14%
  * Baby / infant studies: 14%

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Good pace and clarity: 4'''
 * A bit too fast in general: 2

 * Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days: 2

 * Too advanced, not enough theory: 1

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * Processing EEG data / ERPs: 1
 * More on forward/inverse modeling: 1
 * Source estimation in time-frequecy domain: 1
 * PLV connectivity: 1

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * Development of the functional connectivity: 1
 * Cross-frequency phase synchronization: 1

== Technical issues ==
 * Tree not displaying well (refresh required): 4
 * Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy: 4
 * Tree not displaying at all: 1
 * Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects: 1

== Results analysis ==
=== Results encoding ===
 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
 1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A

=== Results values ===
 1. 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 3
 1. 5 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4
 1. 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 2