Brainstorm workshop survey: Grenoble 2015

Selected comments from attendees

Survey results

Number of participants: 20
Number of returned documents: 17 (85%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

  1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
    • Never used: 53%
    • Some simulation work: 6%
    • Some experimental work: 29%
    • Experienced user: 12%
  2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 0%
    • 4: 65%

    • 5: 35%

  3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
    • Yes: 47%
    • No: 53%
  4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
    • EEG: 82%
    • MEG: 53%
    • MEG+EEG: 29%
    • NIRS: 18%
    • sEEG/ECoG: 35%
    • Scripting: 12%
    • Pre-processing: 53%
    • Visualization of recordings: 53%
    • Source analysis: 83%
    • Time-frequency: 65%
    • Functional connectivity: 65%
    • Statistics: 71%
    • Research: 83%
    • Clinical applications: 35%
    • Epilepsy: 29%
    • Baby / infant studies: 29%
    • Animal studies: 6%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

Missing topics and requests

Missing tools in Brainstorm

WorkshopGrenoble2015Survey (last edited 2015-12-20 13:08:55 by FrancoisTadel)