= Brainstorm workshop survey: Halifax 2013 =
== Selected comments from attendees: ==
 * ''"Really clear and well paced. Good job!"''
 * ''"Pace was awesome, clarity was good. Loved the interactive basis of the workshop"''
 * ''"Very good background and basic explanation, very good commentary on procedures"''
 * ''"Good intro, made things very clear"''
 * ''"A lot of info, but great job of presenting it clearly"''
 * ''"The clarity of the explanation was really good for the allocated time"''
 * ''"Information was conveyed at the perfect pace"<<BR>>''
 * ''"Excellently executed"''
 * ''"Great software! Keep moving forward!!"''
 * ''"Food was great! Loved it! Thanks"''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: '''40'''<<BR>>Number of returned documents: '''31 '''(78%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * '''Never used: 90%'''
  * Some simulation work: '''3%'''
  * Some experimental work: '''3%'''
  * Experienced user: '''4%'''
  * N/A: '''3%'''
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: '''0%'''
  * 2: '''0%'''
  * 3: '''6%'''
  * '''4: 61%'''
  * '''5: 32%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: '''42%'''
  * No: '''52%'''
  * N/A: '''6%'''
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: '''52%'''
  * MEG: '''87%'''
  * MEG+EEG: '''51%'''
  * NIRS: '''0%'''
  * sEEG/ECoG: '''0%'''
  * Scripting:''' 66%'''
  * Pre-processing: '''58%'''
  * Visualization of recordings: '''58%'''
  * Source analysis: '''67%'''
  * Time-frequency: '''58%'''
  * Functional connectivity: '''71%'''
  * Statistics: '''39%'''
  * Research: '''74%'''
  * Clinical applications: '''29%'''
  * Epilepsy: '''13%'''
  * Baby / infant studies: '''3%'''

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Very good pace and clarity: 24'''
 * A bit rushed in the afternoon: 4

 * A bit too slow in the morning: 3
 * Too much for a day: 4
 * Request for a few more breaks: 1
 * Section on time-frequency less clear than the others: 1

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * More on functional connectivity: 3
 * More on different inverse methods: 2
 * More on forward modeling (BEM): 1
 * More on time-frequency: 1
 * Clinical applications / epilepsy: 2
 * Processing EEG data / ERPs: 2
 * Explain which analysis should be used in which research question: 2
 * Export TF/connectivity maps to SPSS: 1
 * Study of deep brain structures: 1
 * Full group analysis: 1
 * Would have been better with Neuromag data: 1
 * More activities that require critical thinking rather than following along: 1
 * How to import external events files: 1

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * '''Development of the functional connectivity: 8'''
 * Pipeline edition similar to !BrainVision (drag and drop): 2
 * Beamformers: 2
 * MEG/EEG + fMRI: 2
 * Add markers in the imported data: 1
 * Easy way to cancel ongoing process: 1
 * Better stats: 1
 * Allow for behavioral covariates: 1
 * Motion correction: 1

== Technical issues ==
 * Some bugs with the scouts: 5

== Results analysis ==
=== Results encoding ===
 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
 1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A

=== Results values ===
 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
 1. 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5
 1. 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1