= Brainstorm workshop survey: Los Angeles 2015 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 * ''"Very clear! The UI and apparent robustness of the software helped a lot with clarity."''
 * ''"Well paced, relatively easy to keep pace, even as a beginner user."''
 * ''"Lot of information, but well paced."''
 * ''"Answered all questions clearly."''
 * ''"Excellent!"''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 24<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 19 (79%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * '''Never used: 68%'''
  * Some simulation work: 5%
  * Some experimental work: 27%
  * Experienced user: 0%
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 10%
  * 4: 16%
  * '''5: 74%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: 68%
  * No: 32%
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: 100%
  * MEG: 21%
  * MEG+EEG: 10%
  * NIRS: 10%
  * sEEG/ECoG: 10%
  * Scripting: 32%
  * Pre-processing: 68%
  * Visualization of recordings: 74%
  * Source analysis: 68%
  * Time-frequency: 63%
  * Functional connectivity: 47%
  * Statistics: 63%
  * Research: 74%
  * Clinical applications: 21%
  * Epilepsy: 10%
  * Baby / child studies: 5%

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Good clarity: 16'''
 * '''Good pace: 12'''
 * A bit slow: 3
 * Uneven pace: 1
 * Need more short breaks: 1
 * Too much time on personal questions: 1
 * Some advertised topics were not covered: 2
 * Need more time / two days: 2

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * Connectivity: 3
 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): 3
 * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): 3
 * Interface with command line Matlab: 2
 * More on frequency analysis: 1

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * Integration with fMRI: 2
 * Realtime processing and display: 2