= Brainstorm workshop survey: Los Angeles 2015 = == Selected comments from attendees == * ''"Very clear! The UI and apparent robustness of the software helped a lot with clarity."'' * ''"Well paced, relatively easy to keep pace, even as a beginner user."'' * ''"Lot of information, but well paced."'' * ''"Answered all questions clearly."'' * ''"Excellent!"'' == Survey results == Number of participants: 24<
>Number of returned documents: 19 (79%)<
>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. === Summary === 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm: * '''Never used: 68%''' * Some simulation work: 5% * Some experimental work: 27% * Experienced user: 0% 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: 0% * 2: 0% * 3: 10% * 4: 16% * '''5: 74%''' 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class: * Yes: 68% * No: 32% 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for: * EEG: 100% * MEG: 21% * MEG+EEG: 10% * NIRS: 10% * sEEG/ECoG: 10% * Scripting: 32% * Pre-processing: 68% * Visualization of recordings: 74% * Source analysis: 68% * Time-frequency: 63% * Functional connectivity: 47% * Statistics: 63% * Research: 74% * Clinical applications: 21% * Epilepsy: 10% * Baby / child studies: 5% == Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. === Comments about the workshop === * '''Good clarity: 16''' * '''Good pace: 12''' * A bit slow: 3 * Uneven pace: 1 * Need more short breaks: 1 * Too much time on personal questions: 1 * Some advertised topics were not covered: 2 * Need more time / two days: 2 === Missing topics and requests === * Connectivity: 3 * EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions): 3 * EEG/SEEG examples (recordings): 3 * Interface with command line Matlab: 2 * More on frequency analysis: 1 === Missing tools in Brainstorm === * Integration with fMRI: 2 * Realtime processing and display: 2