= Brainstorm workshop survey: Marseille 2015 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 * ''"The lectures are very clear and helpful for understanding the workshop"''
 * ''"The workshop was very interesting and didactic, the speakers did a great job!"''
 * ''"Very interesting lectures and great hands-on time"''
 * ''"Excellente formation, très claire et pédagogique!"''
 * ''"Très pédagogique et amical"''
 * ''"Parfait!"''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 30<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 19 (63%)<<BR>>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: 47%
  * Some simulation work: 5%
  * Some experimental work: 48%
  * Experienced user: 0%   (advanced users were present but didn't return the survey)
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 0%
  * 4: 16%
  * '''5: ''''''85%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: 74%
  * No: 26%
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: 79%
  * MEG: 53%
  * MEG+EEG: 21%
  * NIRS: 0%
  * sEEG/ECoG: 11%
  * Scripting: 21%
  * Pre-processing: 47%
  * Visualization of recordings: 47%
  * Source analysis: 74%
  * Time-frequency: 53%
  * Functional connectivity: 53%
  * Statistics: 47%
  * Research: 42%
  * Clinical applications: 11%
  * Epilepsy: 5%
  * Baby / child studies: 0%
  * TMS: 5%
  * Electrophysiology: 5%

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * '''Good clarity: 16'''
 * '''Good pace: 7'''
 * A bit dense: 2
 * A bit fast: 2
 * Breaks should be respected: 1

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * '''Group analysis: 5'''
 * More on statistics: 2
 * More on ROIs: 1

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * '''More statistics (ANOVAs, non-parametric, ...): 6'''
 * '''Links between FieldTrip and Brainstorm: 3'''''''''
 * Documentation of all the processes options: 2
 * Better artifact rejection: 2
 * Standard deviation on the averages: 1
 * Microstate analysis: 1
 * Rasterplots: 1
 * Beamformers: 1
 * Spatial filters (Laplacian): 1
 * More possibilities for overlaying data: 1

== Technical issues ==
 * Win32 computers: many out of memory errors
 * Installation of OpenMEEG on MacBooks caused problems

== Results analysis ==
=== Results encoding ===
 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
 1. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A

=== Results values ===
 1. 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1
 1. 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5
 1. 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1