{{attachment:neuro.jpg}} = MEG@McGill Training Program 2015: Survey = Full week training to learn everything about MEG: paradigm design, acquisition and advanced data analysis. == Survey results == Number of participants: 12<
>Number of returned documents: 12 (100%) === Summary === 1. Overall, how did the training program meet your expectations? * Poor: 0% * Fair: 0% * Good: 16% * '''Excellent: 83%''' 1. How would you rate the first day of lectures? * Poor: 0% * Fair: 16% * '''Good: 58%''' * '''Excellent: 25%''' 1. How would you rate the hands-on part of the program? * Poor: 0% * Fair: 0% * Good: 8% * '''Excellent: 92%''' 1. What did you like the best (multiple choice)? * Support: 58% * Food: 16% * Weather: 0% * '''Expertise of the team: 100%''' 1. Would you recommend the training to your collaborators and colleagues? * '''Yes: 100%''' * No: 0% == Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. * Notify the accepted participants in advance: 2 * Prepare the groups in advance: 1 * Lecture day too advanced and too specific / would be better to extend training: 2 * Add lecture on differences EEG/MEG: 1 * More guidance/time in experiment design: 2 * Less time in experiment design: 1 * More time to test the paradigm before the acquisition: 1 * More time for advanced analysis (explain theory/parameters): 4 * Individual sessions with participants to answer specific research questions: 2 * Room too small: 1