= Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012 = == Survey results == Number of participants: '''40'''<
>Number of returned documents: '''15 '''(38%)<
>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]]. === Summary === 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm: * Never used: '''87%''' * Some simulation work: '''0%''' * Some experimental work: '''13%''' * Experienced user: '''0%''' 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: '''0%''' * 2: '''0%''' * 3: '''13%''' * 4: '''40%''' * 5: '''47%''' 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class: * Yes: '''33%''' * No: '''67%''' 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for: * EEG: '''53%''' * MEG: '''93%''' * MEG+EEG: '''40%''' * NIRS: '''13%''' * sEEG/ECoG: '''7%''' * Scripting:''' 7%''' * Pre-processing: '''20%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''47%''' * Source analysis: '''67%''' * Time-frequency: '''73%''' * Functional connectivity: '''60%''' * Statistics: '''40%''' * Research: '''80%''' * Clinical applications: '''13%''' * Epilepsy: '''13%''' * Baby / infant studies: '''7%''' == Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. === Comments about the workshop === * Very good pace: 9 * A bit slow: 1 * A bit fast: 4 * Too much info / split in two days: 4 * Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1 * Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1 === Missing topics and requests === * Statistics: 1 * More EEG / ERPs: 3 * More example of studies: 1 * More connectivity: 1 * More about source localization techniques: 1 * Group analysis: 1 === Missing tools in Brainstorm === * p-values in connectivity analysis: 2 * Video tutorials on the website: 1 * Phase-synchrony analysis: 1 * Multi-variate Granger causality: 1 * Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1 * Intra-cranial EEG: 1 * Time-variant connectivity measures: 1 == Results analysis == === Results encoding === 1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA 1. How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A 1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A === Results values === 1. 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4 1. 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1