= Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012 =
== Survey results ==
Number of participants: '''40'''<
>Number of returned documents: '''15 '''(38%)<
>[[attachment:workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document|&do=get]].
=== Summary ===
1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
* Never used: '''87%'''
* Some simulation work: '''0%'''
* Some experimental work: '''13%'''
* Experienced user: '''0%'''
1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
* 1: '''0%'''
* 2: '''0%'''
* 3: '''13%'''
* 4: '''40%'''
* 5: '''47%'''
1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
* Yes: '''33%'''
* No: '''67%'''
1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
* EEG: '''53%'''
* MEG: '''93%'''
* MEG+EEG: '''40%'''
* NIRS: '''13%'''
* sEEG/ECoG: '''7%'''
* Scripting:''' 7%'''
* Pre-processing: '''20%'''
* Visualization of recordings: '''47%'''
* Source analysis: '''67%'''
* Time-frequency: '''73%'''
* Functional connectivity: '''60%'''
* Statistics: '''40%'''
* Research: '''80%'''
* Clinical applications: '''13%'''
* Epilepsy: '''13%'''
* Baby / infant studies: '''7%'''
== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
=== Comments about the workshop ===
* Very good pace: 9
* A bit slow: 1
* A bit fast: 4
* Too much info / split in two days: 4
* Should tell the people to bring a mouse: 1
* Give a printed version of the program / analysis steps: 1
=== Missing topics and requests ===
* Statistics: 1
* More EEG / ERPs: 3
* More example of studies: 1
* More connectivity: 1
* More about source localization techniques: 1
* Group analysis: 1
=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
* p-values in connectivity analysis: 2
* Video tutorials on the website: 1
* Phase-synchrony analysis: 1
* Multi-variate Granger causality: 1
* Multi-subject loops from the GUI: 1
* Intra-cranial EEG: 1
* Time-variant connectivity measures: 1
== Results analysis ==
=== Results encoding ===
1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
1. How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
1. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
=== Results values ===
1. 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1. 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 4
1. 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1