Brainstorm workshop survey: Pittsburgh 2016

Selected comments from attendees

Survey results

Number of participants during the first day: 18
Number of participants during the second day: 10
Number of returned documents: 9 (90%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

  1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
    • Never used: 89%

    • Some simulation work: 0%
    • Some experimental work: 11%
    • Experienced user: 0%
  2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 0%
    • 4: 44%

    • 5: 56%

  3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
    • Yes: 56%
    • No: 44%
  4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
    • EEG: 89%
    • MEG: 22%
    • MEG+EEG: 11%
    • NIRS: 11%
    • sEEG/ECoG: 11%
    • Scripting: 11%
    • Pre-processing: 44%
    • Visualization of recordings: 33%
    • Source analysis: 11%
    • Time-frequency: 33%
    • Functional connectivity: 33%
    • Statistics: 67%
    • Research: 89%
    • Clinical applications: 22%
    • Epilepsy: 11%
    • Baby / infant studies: 0%
    • Animal studies: 0%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

Missing topics and requests

Missing tools in Brainstorm

WorkshopPittsburgh2016Survey (last edited 2017-04-12 11:50:24 by FrancoisTadel)