Brainstorm workshop survey: Talca, Chile 2018

Selected comments from attendees

• The workshop was excellent.

• A steady pace with a good mixture of theory and practice.

• Excelente curso. Muy claro y profundo con supuestos teoricos y practicos. Felicitaciones!

Survey results

Number of participants: 25
Number of returned documents: 12
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:

   • Never used: 58%

   • Some simulation work: 8%
   • Some experimental work: 33%
   • Experienced user: 0%
2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
   • 1: 0%
   • 2: 0%
   • 3: 0%
   • 4: 25%

   • 5: 75%

3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
   • Yes: 33%
   • No: 67%
4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
   • EEG: 92%
   • MEG: 8%
   • MEG+EEG: 0%
   • NIRS: 17%
   • sEEG/ECoG: 0%
   • Scripting: 17%
   • Pre-processing: 50%
   • Visualization of recordings: 50%
   • Source analysis: 58%
   • Time-frequency: 67%
   • Functional connectivity: 58%
   • Statistics: 67%
   • Research: 50%
   • Clinical applications: 17%
   • Epilepsy: 0%
   • Baby / infant studies: 17%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

• Good clarity: 8
• Good pace: 4
• Sometimes too fast: 4
• More time on advanced topics: 2
• Better in a lab with faster computers: 1

Missing topics and requests

• EEG topics
• In-depth time frequency
• Complex experimental paradigms
• Segmentation

Missing tools in Brainstorm

• More advanced statistics
• Processing complementary psychophysical or peripheral data
• Fractality and nonlinear models
• Electromyogram (EMG)
• Network metrics for connectivity graph