= Brainstorm workshop survey: Talca, Chile 2018 =
== Selected comments from attendees ==
 * ''The workshop was excellent. ''
 * ''A steady pace with a good mixture of theory and practice.''
 * ''Excelente curso. Muy claro y profundo con supuestos teoricos y practicos. Felicitaciones! ''

== Survey results ==
Number of participants: 25<<BR>>Number of returned documents: 12<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/WorkshopLosAngeles2015Survey?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=workshop_survey.pdf|Link to the pdf document]].

=== Summary ===
 1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
  * Never used: '''58%'''
  * Some simulation work: 8%
  * Some experimental work: 33%
  * Experienced user: 0%
 1. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
  * 1: 0%
  * 2: 0%
  * 3: 0%
  * 4: 25%
  * 5: '''75%'''
 1. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
  * Yes: 33%
  * No: 67%
 1. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
  * EEG: 92%
  * MEG: 8%
  * MEG+EEG: 0%
  * NIRS: 17%
  * sEEG/ECoG: 0%
  * Scripting: 17%
  * Pre-processing: 50%
  * Visualization of recordings: 50%
  * Source analysis: 58%
  * Time-frequency: 67%
  * Functional connectivity: 58%
  * Statistics: 67%
  * Research: 50%
  * Clinical applications: 17%
  * Epilepsy: 0%
  * Baby / infant studies: 17%

== Comments and suggestions ==
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

=== Comments about the workshop ===
 * Good clarity: 8
 * Good pace: 4
 * Sometimes too fast: 4
 * More time on advanced topics: 2
 * Better in a lab with faster computers: 1

=== Missing topics and requests ===
 * EEG topics
 * In-depth time frequency
 * Complex experimental paradigms
 * Segmentation

=== Missing tools in Brainstorm ===
 * More advanced statistics
 * Processing complementary psychophysical or peripheral data
 * Fractality and nonlinear models
 * Electromyogram (EMG)
 * Network metrics for connectivity graph