Is it possible to have precise source imaging?

Hello everyone and thank you for your amazing work

With your tutorials and forums i can now use brainstorm to get source imaging on epileptic spikes in EEG, wich is great.

I mainly use cMEM, sLORETA and i have interesting resultats: 3D maps of possible location.

These results are good but i want "more"

Can i get a mean to link these maps with anatomy (automatically) or an atlas.
I can do it manually bu it is a source of errors due to human biais.

Can brain storm estimate the surface or volume of brain

Can we "compare" these results beetwen patients or techniques?

Same question with dipole modeling- dipole scanning / dippole fitting, the resuts are really pretty but can i get a surface/volume or the dipoles, the anatomical localisation?

Thanks again

All the Brainstorm features are documented in the online tutorials:
https://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/Tutorials

Please scroll through all of them, including all the advanced ones, in order to get an global overview of what you can expect to do with the software. What you don't find in there is most likely not available in this software.

Can i get a mean to link these maps with anatomy (automatically) or an atlas.

Yes, the brain segmentation and ROI analysis can be automated.

Please try to post more specific questions.

Can brain storm estimate the surface or volume of brain

No. This is not the appropriate tool for anatomy processing and volumetry.
You may use tools specialized in this topics like CAT12, FreeSurfer, BrainSuite, FSL...

Can we "compare" these results beetwen patients or techniques?

Same question with dipole modeling- dipole scanning / dippole fitting, the resuts are really pretty but can i get a surface/volume or the dipoles,

A dipole is a single point in space, not a surface or a volume. Please follow the two tutorials below and get back to us with more specific questions: