Brainstorm workshop survey: Geneva 2015
Selected comments from attendees
- "Thanks very much for this great workshop which I found to be of great clarity"
Survey results
Number of participants: 30
Number of returned documents: 22 (73%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 55%
- Some simulation work: 22%
- Some experimental work: 22%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 5%
4: 45%
5: 55%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 36%
- No: 64%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 86%
- MEG: 18%
- MEG+EEG: 9%
- NIRS: 5%
- sEEG/ECoG: 18%
- Scripting: 32%
- Pre-processing: 36%
- Visualization of recordings: 59%
- Source analysis: 73%
- Time-frequency: 77%
- Functional connectivity: 64%
- Statistics: 45%
- Research: 36%
- Clinical applications: 27%
- Epilepsy: 18%
- Baby / infant studies: 18%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 5
Good pace: 5
- Practice too fast: 2
- Practice too slow: 1
- Lectures too slow: 1
- More time on practice on personal data: 2
- Too much info for beginners: 1
- Need more time / three days: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Statistics: 4
- Resting state: 1
- Bad channel interpolation: 1
- More connectivity: 2
- EEG examples (digitizer, ECoG positions):
- EEG/SEEG examples (recordings):
- Interface with command line Matlab:
- More on frequency analysis:
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Advanced ERP analysis: 1
- Tutorial on dipole fitting: 1
- Easier way to batch: 1
- ERP segmentation: 1
- More statistics: 1
- Integration with fMRI:
- Realtime processing and display: