13132
Comment:

13138

Deletions are marked like this.  Additions are marked like this. 
Line 56:  Line 56: 
{{attachment:select_files}}  { {attachment:select_files.jpg} } 
Partial Least Squares (PLS)
Authors: Golia Shafiei
This tutorial explains the concept of Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis in general, which was first introduced to the neuroimaging community in 1996 (McIntosh et al., 1996). In addition, we illustrate how to use PLS process on a sample data in Brainstorm.
Contents
License
PLS is a free toolbox that is available at Baycrest (https://www.rotmanbaycrest.on.ca/index.php?section=84). The PLS code is written entirely in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc) and can be downloaded from https://www.rotmanbaycrest.on.ca/index.php?section=345. To cite PLS Toolbox, please see the “References” section of this tutorial.
Introduction
Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis is a multivariate statistical technique that is used to find the relationship between two blocks of variables. PLS that has various applications and types (Krishnan et al., 2011); however, the focus of this tutorial is on MeanCentered PLS analysis, which is a common type of PLS while working with neuroimaging data. In this type of PLS analysis, one data block is neural activity (e.g. MEG measurements/source data here) while the other one is the experiment design (e.g. different groups/conditions).
PLS analysis is based on extracting the common information between the two data blocks by finding a correlation matrix and linear combinations of variables in both data blocks that have maximum covariance with one another. In the example provided here, we find a contrast between different conditions as well as patterns of brain activity that maximally covary with that specific contrast.
For this purpose, we take the neural activity as one data block, matrix X, where the rows of matrix X are observations (participants/trials) nested in conditions or groups, and the columns of X are variables that are arranged in a way that time scales are nested within sources. The other data block, matrix Y, is a matrix of dummy coding that is related to experimental design (different groups or conditions) (Krishnan et al., 2011).
PLS analysis first calculates a meancentered matrix using matrices X and Y. Then, singular value decomposition (SVD) is applied on the meancentered matrix. The outcome of PLS analysis is a set of latent variables that are in fact linear combinations of initial variables of the two data blocks that maximally covary with the resulting contrasts (Krishnan et al., 2011, Misic et al., 2016).
Finally, the statistical significance of a latent variable is defined by a pvalue calculated from permutation test. In addition, bootstrapping is used to assess the reliability of each original variable (e.g. a source at a time point) that contributes to the latent variable. Bootstrap ratios are calculated for each original variable for this purpose. More specifically, each latent variable consists of a set of singular values that describe the effect size, as well as a set of singular vectors, or weights, that define the contribution of each initial variable to the latent variables. The ratio of these weights to the standard errors estimated from bootstrapping is called bootstrap ratio. Therefore, the larger the magnitude of a bootstrap ratio, the larger the weight (i.e. contribution to the latent variable) and the smaller the standard error (i.e. higher stability) (McIntosh and Lobaugh, 2004, Misic et al., 2016). Bootstrap ratio can be equivalent to a zscore if we have an approximately normal bootstrap distribution (Efron and Tibshirani, 1986).
PLS analysis was explained in general in this section. However, this tutorial assumes that the users are already familiar with basics of PLS analysis. If PLS is new to you or if you want to read more about PLS and its applications in details, please refer to the articles introduced in “References” section.
Download and installation
In order to run PLS process in Brainstorm, the PLS Toolbox must be downloaded from here and added to MATLAB pathway.
Data, PreProcessing and Source Analysis
The data processed here is the same dataset that is used in MEG visual tutorial: Single subject and MEG visual tutorial: Group analysis. This dataset consists in simultaneous MEG/EEG recordings of 19 subjects performing a simple visual task on a large number of famous, unfamiliar and scrambled faces. The detailed presentation of experiment is available in the MEG visual tutorial: Single Subject.
You can follow this tutorial after processing the data as illustrated in MEG visual tutorial: Single Subject. Then:
Find the subject averages as it is explained in MEG visual tutorial: Group analysis by following the steps in the visual group analysis up to Section 7: Subject averages: Filter and normalize.
After you found all the averages across subjects, continue with Section 7 and filter the signals below 32Hz and extract time as it is explained. However, when filtering the sources, do not normalize the source values with respect to baseline (i.e. do not find zscore).
At this point, continue with the rest of the group analysis tutorial: Project sources on template and apply spatial smoothing on the source maps.
 Data is now ready for PLS analysis.
Running PLS
There are two PLS processes available in Brainstorm: * You can run PLS analysis for only two conditions through the Process2 tab at the bottom of the Brainstorm window.
You can also run PLS analysis for more than two conditions through the Process1 tab at the bottom of the Brainstorm window. This option is explained in the “Advanced” section of this tutorial.
Both of these two processes work in a similar way:
Input: the input files are the source data from different conditions. Number of samples per condition must be the same for all conditions. In order to find meaningful results from PLS statistical analysis, each of the conditions should at least contain 5 observations/trials.
Note: You can also run PLS analysis on sensor level data (channel data). However, the results will not be as meaningful and useful as the ones from source level data.
Output: the output files include bootstrap ratios and pvalues for all latent variables. In addition, you can look at the contrast between conditions (groups and/or experimental tasks) for each latent variable. The output files are explained in details in the following sections.
We will continue with explaining the PLS process for only two conditions from now and we will leave PLS process for more conditions for the Advanced section of this tutorial.
Select files
 Select the process2 tab at the bottom of Brainstorm window.
Drag and drop 16 source files from Group_analysis/FacesMEG to the left (Files A).
Drag and drop 16 source files from Group_analysis/ScrambledMEG to the right (Files B).
 Note that the number of files in each window (“A” and “B”) must be the same.
{ {attachment:select_files.jpg} }
Import the recordings
 Go to the "functional data" view (sorted by subjects).
Rightclick on the TutorialDecoding folder > New subject > Subject01
Leave the default options you defined for the protocol.Right click on the subject node (Subject01) > Review raw file.
Select the file format: "MEG/EEG: Neuromag FIFF (*.fif)"
Select the file: sample_decoding/mem60_tsss_mc.fif
Select "Event channels" to read the triggers from the stimulus channel.
 We will not pay much attention to MEG/MRI registration because we are not going to compute any source models, the decoding is done on the sensor data.
Rightclick on the "Link to raw file" > Import in database.
 Select only two events: 201 (faces) and 203(scenes)
 Epoch time: [100, 1000] ms
 Remove DC offset: Time range: [100, 0] ms
 Do not create separate folders for each event type
You will get a message saying "some epochs are shorter than the others". Answer yes.
Select files
Select the Process2 tab at the bottom of the Brainstorm window.
Drag and drop 40 files from group 201 to the left (Files A).
Drag and drop 40 files from group 203 to the right (Files B).
You can select more than 40 or less. The important thing is that both ‘A’ and ‘B’ should have the same number of files.
Crossvalidation
Crossvalidation is a model validation technique for assessing how the results of our decoding analysis will generalize to an independent data set.
Select process "Decoding > Classification with crossvalidation":
Lowpass cutoff frequency: If set, it will apply a lowpass filter to all the input recordings.
Matlab SVM/LDA: Require Matlab's Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox.
These methods do a kfold stratified crossvalidation for you, meaning that each fold will contain the same proportions of the two types of class labels (option "Number of folds").LibSVM: Requires the LibSVM toolbox (download and add to your path).
The LibSVM crossvalidation may be faster but will not be stratified.
The process will take some time. The results are then saved in a file in the new decoding folder.
If you double click on it you will see a decoding curve across time.
Permutation
This is an iterative procedure. The training and test data for the SVM/LDA classifier are selected in each iteration by randomly permuting the samples and grouping them into bins of size n (you can select the trial bin sizes). In each iteration two samples (one from each condition) are left out for test. The rest of the data are used to train the classifier with.
Select process "Decoding > Classification with crossvalidation". Set options as below:
Trial bin size: If greater than 1, the training data will be randomly grouped into bins of the size you determine here. The samples within each bin are then averaged (we refer to this as subaveraging); the classifier is then trained using the averaged samples. For example, if you have 40 faces and 40 scenes, and you set the trial bin size to 5; then for each condition you will have 8 bins each containing 5 samples. Seven bins from each condition will be used for training, and the two leftout bins (one face bin, one scene bin) will be used for testing the classifier performance.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the McGovern Institute Neurotechnology Program to PIs: Aude Oliva and Dimitrios Pantazis. http://mcgovern.mit.edu/technology/neurotechnologyprogram
References
KhalighRazavi SM, Bainbridge W, Pantazis D, Oliva A (2016)
From what we perceive to what we remember: Characterizing representational dynamics of visual memorability. bioRxiv, 049700.Cichy RM, Pantazis D, Oliva A (2014)
Resolving human object recognition in space and time, Nature Neuroscience, 17:455–462.