Brainstorm workshop survey: Beijing 2017
Selected comments from attendees
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
- Never used: 58%
- Some simulation work: 3%
- Some experimental work: 35%
- Experienced user: 3%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 23%
- 4: 16%
5: 58%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 48%
- No: 42%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG:
- MEG:
- MEG+EEG:
- NIRS:
- sEEG/ECoG:
- Scripting:
- Pre-processing:
- Visualization of recordings:
- Source analysis:
- Time-frequency:
- Functional connectivity:
- Statistics:
- Research:
- Clinical applications:
- Epilepsy:
- Baby / infant studies:
- Animal studies:
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity:
- Good pace:
- Too fast for beginners:
Missing topics and requests
- Group analysis:
- More on scripting:
- More on statistics: