Brainstorm workshop survey: Beijing 2017

Selected comments from attendees

Survey results

Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
   • Never used: 58%
   • Some simulation work: 3%
   • Some experimental work: 35%
   • Experienced user: 3%
2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
   • 1: 0%
   • 2: 0%
   • 3: 23%
   • 4: 16%

   • 5: 58%

3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
   • Yes: 48%
   • No: 42%
4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
   • EEG:
   • MEG:
   • MEG+EEG:
   • NIRS:
   • sEEG/ECoG:
   • Scripting:
   • Pre-processing:
   • Visualization of recordings:
   • Source analysis:
   • Time-frequency:
   • Functional connectivity:
   • Statistics:
   • Research:
   • Clinical applications:
   • Epilepsy:
   • Baby / infant studies:
   • Animal studies:

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

• Good clarity:

• Good pace:
• Too fast for beginners:

Missing topics and requests

• Group analysis:
• More on scripting:
• More on statistics:

Missing tools in Brainstorm