⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2014-09-02 22:11:23
3006
Comment:
|
3028
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* | * "Everything was great!!" * "Fast pace, but I prefer that!" * "Very good, great job :)" * "Overall: very helpful" * "Good pace. Lots of discussion." * "Wonderful course - so informative" * "Francois has an excellent beard" |
Line 10: | Line 16: |
* Never used: '''66%''' * Some simulation work: 0% * Some experimental work: 32% * Experienced user: 0% |
* Never used: '''55%''' * Some simulation work: 5% * Some experimental work: 30% * Experienced user: 10% |
Line 17: | Line 23: |
* 3: 13% * 4: '''53%''' * 5: '''21%''' |
* 3: 10% * 4: '''45%''' * 5: '''45%''' |
Line 21: | Line 27: |
* Yes: 42% * No: 39% * N/A: 18% |
* Yes: 65% * No: 30% * N/A: 5% |
Line 25: | Line 31: |
* EEG: '''37%''' * MEG: '''84%''' * MEG+EEG: 24% * NIRS: 18% * sEEG/ECoG: 18% * Scripting: 13% * Pre-processing: 16% * Visualization of recordings: 18% * Source analysis: '''37%''' * Time-frequency: '''39%''' * Functional connectivity: '''53%''' * Statistics: 16% * Research: '''37%''' * Clinical applications: '''32%''' * Epilepsy: 21% * Baby / infant studies: 8% |
* EEG: 40% * MEG: 75% * MEG+EEG: 40% * NIRS: 10% * sEEG/ECoG: 5% * Scripting: 40% * Pre-processing: 45% * Visualization of recordings: 65% * Source analysis: 65% * Time-frequency: 55% * Functional connectivity: 45% * Statistics: 35% * Research: 50% * Clinical applications: 45% * Epilepsy: 35% * Baby / infant studies: 20% |
Line 46: | Line 52: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 10''' * '''Too fast in general: 8''' * '''Too fast in the afternoon: 4''' * Too slow in the morning: 2 * Difficult to catch up after a problem: 1 |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 11''' * '''Too fast in general: 1''' * '''Too fast in the afternoon: 2''' |
Line 52: | Line 56: |
* English was a problem: 1 | * Too many divergent discussions: 1 * Room too cold: 1 |
Line 55: | Line 60: |
* '''More on connectivity/causality analysis: 7''' * '''Cross-frequency coupling: 4''' * Statistics: 2 * More scripting: 2 * Compare results from multiple subjects: 1 * Resting state analysis: 1 * More analysis in source space (less sensor data): 1 |
* More on statistics: 2 (not covered in the training) * More on scripting: 1 * Sensor-level analysis: 1 * Use of anatomical atlases: 1 * Granger causality: 1 * Less on methods, more on software tricks: 1 * Manipulating complex events/conditions: 1 |
Line 64: | Line 69: |
* '''Development of the functional connectivity: 5''' * Dynamic causal modeling: 1 * Phase locking factor: 1 * Phase-phase coupling: 1 * Beamformers: 1 * Source localization with Champagne algorithm (Owen 2012): 1 * Import SPM/fMRI data: 2 * Support for NIRS: 1 * Creating electrodes maps for ECoG/SEEG: 1 * Define scouts in MNI coordinates: 1 * Other brain models (infants, child, aged): 1 * Graph analysis: 1 * Request for tutorials in Japanese: 1 |
* Beamformers: 4 * Statistics: 4 * Import from other programs (MNE, SPM): 2 * Other TF methods: 1 * Connectivity tutorials: 1 * Statistical significance thresholds on connectivity results: 1 * Cerebellum imported by default: 1 * Annotated dipole fits: 1 * fMRI processing: 1 * NIRS: 1 |
Line 79: | Line 81: |
* '''Scout not selected on the correct surface or not displayed: 10 ''' | * '''Scout not selected on the correct surface or not displayed: 1''' * '''Out of memory while importing anatomy: 1''' * '''Colors inverted in TF/PSD plots: 2''' * '''Multiple interface glitches on Linux / compiled: 1''' |
Line 88: | Line 93: |
1. 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1. 4 5 4 4 0 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 0 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 3 4 4 4 5 5 0 4 3 4 4 3 4 1. 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 |
1. 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1. 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 1. 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Biomag 2014
Selected comments from attendees:
- "Everything was great!!"
- "Fast pace, but I prefer that!"
- "Very good, great job :)"
- "Overall: very helpful"
- "Good pace. Lots of discussion."
- "Wonderful course - so informative"
- "Francois has an excellent beard"
Survey results
Number of participants: 70
Number of returned documents: 38 (51%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 55%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 30%
- Experienced user: 10%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 10%
4: 45%
5: 45%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 65%
- No: 30%
- N/A: 5%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 40%
- MEG: 75%
- MEG+EEG: 40%
- NIRS: 10%
- sEEG/ECoG: 5%
- Scripting: 40%
- Pre-processing: 45%
- Visualization of recordings: 65%
- Source analysis: 65%
- Time-frequency: 55%
- Functional connectivity: 45%
- Statistics: 35%
- Research: 50%
- Clinical applications: 45%
- Epilepsy: 35%
- Baby / infant studies: 20%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 11
Too fast in general: 1
Too fast in the afternoon: 2
- Screen was too small: 1
- Too many divergent discussions: 1
- Room too cold: 1
Missing topics and requests
- More on statistics: 2 (not covered in the training)
- More on scripting: 1
- Sensor-level analysis: 1
- Use of anatomical atlases: 1
- Granger causality: 1
- Less on methods, more on software tricks: 1
- Manipulating complex events/conditions: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Beamformers: 4
- Statistics: 4
- Import from other programs (MNE, SPM): 2
- Other TF methods: 1
- Connectivity tutorials: 1
- Statistical significance thresholds on connectivity results: 1
- Cerebellum imported by default: 1
- Annotated dipole fits: 1
- fMRI processing: 1
- NIRS: 1
Technical issues
Scout not selected on the correct surface or not displayed: 1
Out of memory while importing anatomy: 1
Colors inverted in TF/PSD plots: 2
Multiple interface glitches on Linux / compiled: 1
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 1
- 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 3 5 5
- 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1