Brainstorm workshop survey: Florence 2013
Selected comments from attendees:
- ""
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 14 (35%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 57%
- Some simulation work: 21%
- Some experimental work: 14%
Experienced user: 7%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 7%
4: 43%
5: 50%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 42%
- No: 29%
- N/A: 29%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 92%
- MEG: 14%
- MEG+EEG: 7%
- NIRS: 7%
- sEEG/ECoG: 0%
- Scripting: 21%
Pre-processing: 29%
Visualization of recordings: 36%
Source analysis: 64%
Time-frequency: 57%
Functional connectivity: 64%
Statistics: 29%
Research: 57%
Clinical applications: 29%
- Epilepsy: 14%
- Baby / infant studies: 14%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 14
- A bit rushed in the afternoon: 3
- A bit too fast in general: 2
- A bit too slow in the morning: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Processing EEG data / ERPs: 3
- More on statistics: 2
- More on forward/inverse modeling: 1
- Would have been better with Neuromag data / FIF files: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Better stats: 3
- Development of the functional connectivity: 2
- More pre-processing: filters, different types of artifacts: 1
- Beamformers: 1
- MEG/EEG + fMRI: 1
- Typing the coordinates in the MRI viewer: 1
Technical issues
- Out of memory issues: 5
- Importing the MRI
- SSP computation
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 3
- 5 4 5 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4
- 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 2 2