Brainstorm
  • Comments
  • Menu
    • Attachments
    • Versions
    • Raw Text
    • Print View
  • Login

Software

  • Introduction

  • Gallery

  • Download

  • Installation

Users

  • Tutorials

  • Forum

  • Courses

  • Community

  • Publications

Development

  • What's new

  • What's next

  • About us

  • Contact us

  • Contribute

Revision 4 as of 2015-12-20 12:58:16

Brainstorm workshop survey: Grenoble 2015

Selected comments from attendees

  • "Tres didactique. Interface super! Bravo!"
  • "Contenu clair et bien construit"
  • "Perfect, good overview especially on the interface side"
  • "Organisation de la formation bien construite (theorie vs pratique). Partie pratique: TB"

Survey results

Number of participants: 19
Number of returned documents: 17 (89%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

  1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
    • Never used: 53%
    • Some simulation work: 6%
    • Some experimental work: 29%
    • Experienced user: 12%
  2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: 0%
    • 2: 0%
    • 3: 0%
    • 4: 65%

    • 5: 35%

  3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
    • Yes: 47%
    • No: 53%
  4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
    • EEG: 82%
    • MEG: 53%
    • MEG+EEG: 29%
    • NIRS: 18%
    • sEEG/ECoG: 35%
    • Scripting: 12%
    • Pre-processing: 53%
    • Visualization of recordings: 53%
    • Source analysis: 83%
    • Time-frequency: 65%
    • Functional connectivity: 65%
    • Statistics: 71%
    • Research: 83%
    • Clinical applications: 35%
    • Epilepsy: 29%
    • Baby / infant studies: 29%
    • Animal studies: 6%

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

  • Good clarity: 9

  • Good pace: 5

  • More time for questions: 1
  • A bit slow: 1
  • Too fast for beginners: 3
  • Uneven pace:
  • Need more short breaks:
  • Too much time on personal questions:
  • Some advertised topics were not covered:
  • Need more time / two days:

Missing topics and requests

  • Differences EEG/MEG: 1
  • Group analysis: 1
  • More explanations of the analysis parameters: 3
  • ECoG/sEEG examples: 1
  • BEM head model: 1
  • More scripting: 1
  • Animal examples: 1
  • Clinical examples: 1

Missing tools in Brainstorm

  • Advanced ERP analysis: 1
  • EEG-fMRI:1
  • No certifications for clinical use: 1
  • BSS/ICA for identification of neural sources: 1
  • Connectivity documentation: 1
  • More statistics: 1
  • Beamformers: 1
  • Multiple sparse priors / DCM: 1
  • Offline tutorial: 1
  • MoinMoin Powered
  • Python Powered
  • GPL licensed
  • Valid HTML 4.01