Brainstorm workshop survey: Los Angeles 2015
Selected comments from attendees
Survey results
Number of participants: 24
Number of returned documents: 19 (79%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 68%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 27%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 10%
- 4: 16%
5: 74%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 68%
- No: 32%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 100%
- MEG: 21%
- MEG+EEG: 10%
- NIRS: 10%
- sEEG/ECoG: 10%
- Scripting: 32%
- Pre-processing: 68%
- Visualization of recordings: 74%
- Source analysis: 68%
- Time-frequency: 63%
- Functional connectivity: 47%
- Statistics: 63%
- Research: 74%
- Clinical applications: 21%
- Epilepsy: 10%
- Baby / child studies: 5%
- Real-time DSP/reporting/viz: 5%
- fMRI: 5%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good clarity: 20
Good pace: 16
- A bit slow: 4
- A bit fast: 2
- Need more time: 2
- Time-frequency/connectivity part could be improved: 1
- Handouts more detailed: 1
Missing topics and requests
- Resting state: 2
- More on statistics: 2
- More on scripting: 1
- More on connectivity: 1
- Group analysis: 1
- PAC: 1
- Filtering: 1
- Writing plugin modules: 1
- Export NIfTI files: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
Beamforming: 8
More statistics: 4
- Head motion detection and correction: 2
- More connectivity measures: 2
- Child template: 1
Technical issues
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 1
- 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
- 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1