Brainstorm
  • Comments
  • Menu
    • Attachments
    • Versions
    • Raw Text
    • Print View
  • Login

Software

  • Introduction

  • Gallery

  • Download

  • Installation

Users

  • Tutorials

  • Forum

  • Courses

  • Community

  • Publications

Development

  • What's new

  • What's next

  • About us

  • Contact us

  • Contribute

Revision 2 as of 2013-02-18 21:54:10

Brainstorm workshop survey: Neuro 2012

Selected comments from attendees:

  • "

Survey results

Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 15 (38%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

  1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
    • Never used: %

    • Some simulation work: %

    • Some experimental work: %

    • Experienced user: %

    • N/A: %

  2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
    • 1: %

    • 2: %

    • 3: %

    • 4: %

    • 5: %

  3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
    • Yes: %

    • No: %

    • N/A: %

  4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
    • EEG: %

    • MEG: %

    • MEG+EEG: %

    • NIRS: %

    • sEEG/ECoG: %

    • Scripting: %

    • Pre-processing: %

    • Visualization of recordings: %

    • Source analysis: %

    • Time-frequency: %

    • Functional connectivity: %

    • Statistics: %

    • Research: %

    • Clinical applications: %

    • Epilepsy: %

    • Baby / infant studies: %

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

  • V

Missing topics and requests

  • M

Missing tools in Brainstorm

  • D

Technical issues

Results analysis

Results encoding

  1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
  2. How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
  3. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A

Results values

  • MoinMoin Powered
  • Python Powered
  • GPL licensed
  • Valid HTML 4.01