2982
Comment:
|
← Revision 5 as of 2014-10-20 19:22:55 ⇥
2621
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* ''"Very good, great job :)"'' * ''"Fast pace, but I prefer that!" '' * ''"Good pace. Lots of discussion" '' * ''"Wonderful course - so informative" '' * ''"Francois has an excellent beard" '' |
* ''"THANKS - it was a great workshop"'' * ''"Well paced, questions answered clearly"'' * ''"Very good workshop, lots of info"'' * ''"A little fast for me at times, but Beth was super helpful in getting me back on track"'' |
Line 14: | Line 13: |
* Never used: '''55%''' * Some simulation work: 5% * Some experimental work: 30% * Experienced user: 10% |
* Never used: '''54%''' * Some simulation work: 8% * Some experimental work: 38% * Experienced user: 0% |
Line 21: | Line 20: |
* 3: 10% * 4: '''45%''' * 5: '''45%''' |
* 3: 0% * 4: '''77%''' * 5: '''23%''' |
Line 25: | Line 24: |
* Yes: 65% * No: 30% * N/A: 5% |
* Yes: 62% * No: 31% * N/A: 8% |
Line 29: | Line 28: |
* EEG: 40% * MEG: 75% * MEG+EEG: 40% * NIRS: 10% * sEEG/ECoG: 5% * Scripting: 40% * Pre-processing: 45% * Visualization of recordings: 65% * Source analysis: 65% * Time-frequency: 55% * Functional connectivity: 45% * Statistics: 35% * Research: 50% * Clinical applications: 45% * Epilepsy: 35% * Baby / infant studies: 20% |
* EEG: 77% * MEG: 77% * MEG+EEG: 54% * NIRS: 0% * sEEG/ECoG: 8% * Scripting: 23% * Pre-processing: 46% * Visualization of recordings: 53% * Source analysis: 69% * Time-frequency: 54% * Functional connectivity: 46% * Statistics: 38% * Research: 85% * Clinical applications: 38% * Epilepsy: 46% * Baby / infant studies: 0% |
Line 50: | Line 49: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 11''' * '''Too fast in general: 1''' * '''Too fast in the afternoon: 2''' * Screen was too small: 1 * Too many divergent discussions: 1 * Room too cold: 1 |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 6''' * '''Too fast in the afternoon: 4''' |
Line 58: | Line 53: |
* More on statistics: 2 (not covered in the training) * More on scripting: 1 * Sensor-level analysis: 1 * Use of anatomical atlases: 1 * Granger causality: 1 * Less on methods, more on software tricks: 1 * Manipulating complex events/conditions: 1 |
* Import own results and use Brainstorm just for display: 1 * Explain better the dataset used for the workshop: 1 * More on group analysis: 1 * More on basic ERP analysis: 1 * Less on connectivity & time-frequency: 1 * Loading own ROIs: 1 |
Line 67: | Line 61: |
* Beamformers: 4 * Statistics: 4 * Import from other programs (MNE, SPM): 2 * Other TF methods: 1 * Connectivity tutorials: 1 * Statistical significance thresholds on connectivity results: 1 * Cerebellum imported by default: 1 * Annotated dipole fits: 1 * fMRI processing: 1 * NIRS: 1 |
* Beamformers: 2 * Dipole fitting: 1 * Statistics: 1 * Multi-variate pattern analysis: 1 |
Line 79: | Line 67: |
* '''Scout not selected on the correct surface or not displayed: 1''' * '''Out of memory while importing anatomy: 1''' * '''Colors inverted in TF/PSD plots: 2''' * '''Multiple interface glitches on Linux / compiled: 1''' |
* '''Out of memory while importing anatomy: 7''' * '''Windows PC with no admin rights: 3''' * Function fminsearch missing in Matlab: 1 * Forgot a few times to explain how to get back to initial state before new analysis |
Line 91: | Line 79: |
1. 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1. 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 1. 0 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 |
1. 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 1. 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 1. 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Orlando 2014
Selected comments from attendees
"THANKS - it was a great workshop"
"Well paced, questions answered clearly"
"Very good workshop, lots of info"
"A little fast for me at times, but Beth was super helpful in getting me back on track"
Survey results
Number of participants: 35
Number of returned documents: 13 (37%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 54%
- Some simulation work: 8%
- Some experimental work: 38%
- Experienced user: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 0%
4: 77%
5: 23%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 62%
- No: 31%
- N/A: 8%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 77%
- MEG: 77%
- MEG+EEG: 54%
- NIRS: 0%
- sEEG/ECoG: 8%
- Scripting: 23%
- Pre-processing: 46%
- Visualization of recordings: 53%
- Source analysis: 69%
- Time-frequency: 54%
- Functional connectivity: 46%
- Statistics: 38%
- Research: 85%
- Clinical applications: 38%
- Epilepsy: 46%
- Baby / infant studies: 0%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 6
Too fast in the afternoon: 4
Missing topics and requests
- Import own results and use Brainstorm just for display: 1
- Explain better the dataset used for the workshop: 1
- More on group analysis: 1
- More on basic ERP analysis: 1
Less on connectivity & time-frequency: 1
- Loading own ROIs: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- Beamformers: 2
- Dipole fitting: 1
- Statistics: 1
- Multi-variate pattern analysis: 1
Technical issues
Out of memory while importing anatomy: 7
Windows PC with no admin rights: 3
- Function fminsearch missing in Matlab: 1
- Forgot a few times to explain how to get back to initial state before new analysis
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1
- 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4
- 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2