Brainstorm workshop survey: Osaka 2014

Selected comments from attendees:

Survey results

Number of participants: 70
Number of returned documents: 38 (51%)
Link to the pdf document.

Summary

1. Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
   • Never used:
   • Some simulation work:
   • Some experimental work:
   • Experienced user:
2. How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
   • 1: 0%
   • 2: 0%
   • 3:
   • 4:
   • 5:
3. Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
   • Yes:
   • No:
   • N/A:
4. Interested in using Brainstorm for:
   • EEG:
   • MEG:
   • MEG+EEG:
   • NIRS:
   • sEEG/ECoG:
   • Scripting:
   • Pre-processing:
   • Visualization of recordings:
   • Source analysis:
   • Time-frequency:
   • Functional connectivity:
   • Statistics:
   • Research:
   • Clinical applications:
   • Epilepsy:
   • Baby / infant studies:

Comments and suggestions

The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.

Comments about the workshop

• Good pace and clarity:

• A bit too fast in general:
• Too dense, request for splitting in 2 days:
• Too advanced, not enough theory:

Missing topics and requests

• Processing EEG data / ERPs:
• More on forward/inverse modeling:
• Source estimation in time-frequecy domain:
• PLV connectivity:

Missing tools in Brainstorm

• Development of the functional connectivity:
• Cross-frequency phase synchronization:

Technical issues

• Tree not displaying well (refresh required):
• Fiducials not saved while editing the anatomy:
• Tree not displaying at all:
• Trouble typing the name of the protocols/subjects:

Results analysis

Results encoding

1. 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
2. How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
3. Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A

Results values