2557
Comment:
|
2957
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* | * "Super! Thank you both! Clearly thought-out teaching plan + practical pace" * "For being very new to neuroimaging analysis, I was very impressed that I was able to follow along" |
Line 10: | Line 11: |
* Never used: '''59%''' * Some simulation work: '''10%''' * Some experimental work: '''24%''' * Experienced user:''' '''7% |
* Never used: '''81%''' * Some simulation work: 6% * Some experimental work: 6% * Experienced user:''' '''6% |
Line 18: | Line 19: |
* 3: 0% * 4: '''21%''' * 5: '''79%''' |
* 3: 6% * 4: '''68%''' * 5: '''19%''' |
Line 22: | Line 23: |
* Yes: '''37%''' * No: '''48%''' * N/A: 14% |
* Yes: '''56%''' * No: '''44%''' |
Line 26: | Line 26: |
* EEG: '''66%''' * MEG: '''55%''' * MEG+EEG: '''34%''' * NIRS: 0% * sEEG/ECoG: 7% * Scripting: 14% * Pre-processing: '''48%''' * Visualization of recordings: '''59%''' * Source analysis: '''52%''' * Time-frequency: '''52%''' * Functional connectivity: '''45%''' * Statistics: '''48%''' * Research: '''52%''' * Clinical applications: 7% * Epilepsy: 7% * Baby / infant studies: 3% |
* EEG: '''88%''' * MEG:''' 50%''' * MEG+EEG: 31% * NIRS: 13% * sEEG/ECoG: 13% * Scripting: 6% * Pre-processing: 38% * Visualization of recordings: '''56% ''' * Source analysis: '''69%''' * Time-frequency: '''63%''' * Functional connectivity: '''81%''' * Statistics: '''50%''' * Research: '''69%''' * Clinical applications: '''63%''' * Epilepsy: '''56%''' * Baby / infant studies: '''44%''' * Other: Non-human primate: 6% |
Line 47: | Line 48: |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 14''' * A bit rushed in the afternoon: 3 * A bit too fast in general: 2 |
* '''Good pace and clarity: 10''' * Too fast in general: 2 |
Line 53: | Line 53: |
* Too long / two-day workshop: 2 * '''Give print-outs to follow along: 4''' * Not well organized and examples confusing: 1 * Computer too slow: 2 * Reserving a computer lab to avoid laptop issues: 1 * More time for Mosher talk: 1 |
|
Line 54: | Line 66: |
* Processing EEG data / ERPs: 3 * More on statistics: 2 * More on forward/inverse modeling: 1 * Would have been better with Neuromag data / FIF files: 1 |
* '''More EEG specific material: 5''' * Pre-processing of MRI / FreeSurfer segmentation: 2 * MEG/EEG fusion: 1 * Assistance on processing custom data: 1 * Videos to illustrate the steps that are skipped: 1 * Analysis of published data rather than median-nerve: 1 * Speaker good with technical, but testing hypothesis might be best way to demo to diverse audience: 1 * Working with multiple subjects: 1 |
Line 60: | Line 76: |
* Better stats: 3 * Development of the functional connectivity: 2 * More pre-processing: filters, different types of artifacts: 1 * Beamformers: 1 * MEG/EEG + fMRI: 1 * Typing the coordinates in the MRI viewer: 1 |
* '''More stats: 3''' * '''More connectivity: 3''' * Phase-locking index: 1 |
Line 68: | Line 81: |
* Out of memory issues: 5 * Importing the MRI * SSP computation |
* Out of memory issues: ? |
Line 79: | Line 90: |
1. 2 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1. 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 1. 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 |
1. 1 1 3 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 0 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 1. 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Moscow 2013
Selected comments from attendees:
- "Super! Thank you both! Clearly thought-out teaching plan + practical pace"
- "For being very new to neuroimaging analysis, I was very impressed that I was able to follow along"
Survey results
Number of participants: 35
Number of returned documents: 16 (45%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 81%
- Some simulation work: 6%
- Some experimental work: 6%
Experienced user: 6%
- N/A: 0%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 6%
4: 68%
5: 19%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 56%
No: 44%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 88%
MEG: 50%
- MEG+EEG: 31%
- NIRS: 13%
- sEEG/ECoG: 13%
- Scripting: 6%
- Pre-processing: 38%
Visualization of recordings: 56%
Source analysis: 69%
Time-frequency: 63%
Functional connectivity: 81%
Statistics: 50%
Research: 69%
Clinical applications: 63%
Epilepsy: 56%
Baby / infant studies: 44%
- Other: Non-human primate: 6%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Good pace and clarity: 10
- Too fast in general: 2
- A bit too slow in the morning: 1
- Too long / two-day workshop: 2
Give print-outs to follow along: 4
- Not well organized and examples confusing: 1
- Computer too slow: 2
- Reserving a computer lab to avoid laptop issues: 1
- More time for Mosher talk: 1
Missing topics and requests
More EEG specific material: 5
Pre-processing of MRI / FreeSurfer segmentation: 2
- MEG/EEG fusion: 1
- Assistance on processing custom data: 1
- Videos to illustrate the steps that are skipped: 1
- Analysis of published data rather than median-nerve: 1
- Speaker good with technical, but testing hypothesis might be best way to demo to diverse audience: 1
- Working with multiple subjects: 1
Missing tools in Brainstorm
More stats: 3
More connectivity: 3
- Phase-locking index: 1
Technical issues
- Out of memory issues: ?
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(worst) to 5(best), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 3 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
- 0 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
- 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2