Brainstorm workshop survey: Halifax 2013
Selected comments from attendees:
"
Survey results
Number of participants: 40
Number of returned documents: 31 (78%)
Link to the pdf document.
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 90%
Some simulation work: 3%
Some experimental work: 3%
Experienced user: 4%
N/A: 3%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
1: 0%
2: 0%
3: 6%
4: 61%
5: 32%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
Yes: 42%
No: 52%
N/A: 6%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
EEG: 52%
MEG: 87%
MEG+EEG: 51%
NIRS: 0%
sEEG/ECoG: 0%
Scripting: 66%
Pre-processing: 58%
Visualization of recordings: 58%
Source analysis: 67%
Time-frequency: 58%
Functional connectivity: 71%
Statistics: 39%
Research: 74%
Clinical applications: 29%
Epilepsy: 13%
Baby / infant studies: 3%
Comments and suggestions
The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments.
Comments about the workshop
Pace:
Very good pace:
- A bit rushed in the afternoon: 1
- Too slow in the morning:
- Two-day workshop: 2
Missing topics and requests
- M
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- A
Planning to use Brainstorm specifically for:
Connectivity: 10
Source reconstruction: 5
Pre-processing: 4
- EEG: 7
- MEG: 5
- Baby/infant: 3
- Epilepsy: 2
- Time-frequency: 2
- Comparison with Matti's MNE: 1
Technical issues
- Some bugs with the scouts: 5 people
Results analysis
Results encoding
- 1=Never used, 2=Some simulation work, 3=Some experimental work, 4=Experienced user, 0=NA
- How helpful: 1(best) to 5(worst), 0=N/A
- Online tutorials before coming: 1=No, 2=Yes, 0=N/A
Results values
- 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
- 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5
- 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 1