Size: 4357
Comment:
|
Size: 6113
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 14: | Line 14: |
* Overlapping spheres: Huang et al., 1999 * OpenMEEG BEM: Gramfort et al., 2010 / Kybic et al., 2005 |
* Overlapping spheres: Huang et al. 1999 * OpenMEEG BEM: Gramfort et al. 2010 / Kybic et al. 2005 |
Line 19: | Line 19: |
* Tikhonov-regularized minimum-norm: Baillet et al., 2001. <<BR>>Default value for Tikhonov parameter is λ = 10% of maximum singular value of the lead field. | * Tikhonov-regularized inimum norm: Baillet et al., 2001 [[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/BailletMosherLeahy_IEEESPMAG_Nov2001.pdf|Electromagnetic brain mapping]], IEEE SP MAG 2001. * dSPM: Dale et al. 2000 * sLORETA: Pascual-Marqui 2002 '''... proprocessing''' * SSP: Uusitalo et al. 1999 * ICA: Makeig et al. 1996 |
Line 40: | Line 48: |
* Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001)<<BR>>Electromagnetic Brain Mapping<<BR>>IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(6): 14-30, Nov 2001 | * Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001)<<BR>>[[https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/962275|Electromagnetic Brain Mapping]] [[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/BailletMosherLeahy_IEEESPMAG_Nov2001.pdf|pdf]]]<<BR>>IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(6): 14-30, Nov 2001 * Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR, Buckner RL, Belliveau JW, Lewine JD, Halgren E (2000)<<BR>> [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10798392|Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity]]<<BR>>Neuron, Apr 2000, 26(1):55-67 |
Line 42: | Line 52: |
* Huang MX, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (1999)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/PMB99.pdf|A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG]]<<BR>>Phys Med Biol, 44:423-440 * Kybic J, Clerc M, Abboud T, Faugeras O, Keriven R, Papadopoulo T (2005)<<BR>>A common formalism for the integral formulations of the forward EEG problem<<BR>>[[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?isnumber=30034&arnumber=1375158&count=10&index=1|IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24:12-28, 2005.]] [[ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/odyssee/Publications/2005/kybic-clerc-etal:05.pdf|[pdf]]] * Leahy RM, Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Huang MX, Lewine JD (1998)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/Phantom_Ver2.pdf|A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom]]<<BR>>Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 107(2):159-73 * Mosher, Leahy RM, Lewis PS (1999)<<BR>>[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/IEEEBME99.pdf|EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods]]<<BR>>IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng, 46(3):245-259, Mar 1999 |
* Huang MX, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (1999)<<BR>>[[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10070792|A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG]] [[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/PMB99.pdf|pdf]]]<<BR>>Phys Med Biol, 44:423-440 * Kybic J, Clerc M, Abboud T, Faugeras O, Keriven R, Papadopoulo T (2005)<<BR>>[[http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?isnumber=30034&arnumber=1375158&count=10&index=1|A common formalism for the integral formulations of the forward EEG problem]] [[ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/odyssee/Publications/2005/kybic-clerc-etal:05.pdf|[pdf]]]<<BR>>IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24:12-28, 2005 * Leahy RM, Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Huang MX, Lewine JD (1998)<<BR>>[[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9751287|A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom]] [[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/Phantom_Ver2.pdf|pdf]]]<<BR>>Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 107(2):159-73, 1998 * Makeig S, Bell AJ, Jung TP, Sejnowski TJ (1996)<<BR>>[[http://papers.nips.cc/paper/1091-independent-component-analysis-of-electroencephalographic-data.pdf|Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data]]<<BR>>in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 8, eds D. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, and M. E. Hasselmo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 145–151. * Mosher, Leahy RM, Lewis PS (1999)<<BR>>[[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10097460|EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods]] [[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/IEEEBME99.pdf|pdf]]]<<BR>>IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng, 46(3):245-259, Mar 1999 |
Line 47: | Line 58: |
* Pantazis D, Nichols TE, Baillet S, Leahy RM (2005)<<BR>>A Comparison of Random Field Theory and Permutation Methods for the Statistical Analysis of MEG data<<BR>>Neuroimage, 25(2):383-394, 2005 | * Pantazis D, Nichols TE, Baillet S, Leahy RM (2005)<<BR>>[[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811904005671|A Comparison of Random Field Theory and Permutation Methods for the Statistical Analysis of MEG data]] [[[http://neuroimage.usc.edu/paperspdf/Pantazis_Permutations_NeuroImage.pdf|pdf]]]<<BR>>Neuroimage, 25(2):383-394, 2005 * Pascual-Marqui RD (2002)<<BR>>[[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12575463|Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details]]<<BR>>Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002, 24 Suppl D:5-12 |
Line 50: | Line 62: |
* Tadel F, Bock E, Niso G, Mosher JC, Cousineau M, Pantazis D, Leahy RM, Baillet S (2019)<<BR>>[[https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2019.00076/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Neuroscience&id=435877#note13|MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm]]<<BR>>'''Frontiers in Neuroscience''', Feb 2019 | * Tadel F, Bock E, Niso G, Mosher JC, Cousineau M, Pantazis D, Leahy RM, Baillet S (2019)<<BR>>[[https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2019.00076/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Neuroscience&id=435877#note13|MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm]]<<BR>>Frontiers in Neuroscience, Feb 2019 * Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ (1997)<<BR>>[[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02534144?LI=true|Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components]]<<BR>>Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 35, 135–140 |
Cite Brainstorm in your publications
Once you are done with your analyses performed with Brainstorm, proper citation would be greatly appreciated; thank you!
How to cite...
... Brainstorm
Data analysis was performed with Brainstorm (Tadel et al. 2011), which is documented and freely available for download online under the GNU general public license (http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm).
- Group analysis processing pipeline: Tadel et al. 2019
- Resting state processing pipeline: Niso et al. 2019
... forward models
- Spherical head model: Mosher et al. 1999
- Overlapping spheres: Huang et al. 1999
- OpenMEEG BEM: Gramfort et al. 2010 / Kybic et al. 2005
... inverse methods
- Tikhonov-regularized inimum norm: Baillet et al., 2001
Electromagnetic brain mapping, IEEE SP MAG 2001.
- dSPM: Dale et al. 2000
- sLORETA: Pascual-Marqui 2002
... proprocessing
- SSP: Uusitalo et al. 1999
- ICA: Makeig et al. 1996
... the default anatomy
Colin27: MNI brain with a 1mm resolution. More info....
... FreeSurfer
Whether you are using FreeSurfer for the T1 segmentation, the cortical atlases or the FSAverage subject default: please register on their website (registration page) and cite the appropriate references.
... statistical analysis using non-parametric permutation tests
- Permutation tests: Pantazis et al., 2005.
... the tutorial datasets
- TODO
Publications
The previous citations refer to the following publications. Further reading is available in the Publications section.
Baillet S, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (2001)
Electromagnetic Brain Mapping ?pdf]
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(6): 14-30, Nov 2001Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR, Buckner RL, Belliveau JW, Lewine JD, Halgren E (2000)
Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity
Neuron, Apr 2000, 26(1):55-67Gramfort A, Papadopoulo T, Olivi E, Clerc M (2010)
OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 45:9, 2010Huang MX, Mosher JC, Leahy RM (1999)
A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG ?pdf]
Phys Med Biol, 44:423-440Kybic J, Clerc M, Abboud T, Faugeras O, Keriven R, Papadopoulo T (2005)
A common formalism for the integral formulations of the forward EEG problem [pdf]
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 24:12-28, 2005Leahy RM, Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Huang MX, Lewine JD (1998)
A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom ?pdf]
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 107(2):159-73, 1998Makeig S, Bell AJ, Jung TP, Sejnowski TJ (1996)
Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data
in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 8, eds D. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, and M. E. Hasselmo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 145–151.Mosher, Leahy RM, Lewis PS (1999)
EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods ?pdf]
IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng, 46(3):245-259, Mar 1999Niso G, Tadel F, Bock E, Cousineau M, Santos A, Baillet S (2019)
Brainstorm Pipeline Analysis of Resting-State Data from the Open MEG Archive
Frontiers in Neuroscience, Mar 2019Pantazis D, Nichols TE, Baillet S, Leahy RM (2005)
A Comparison of Random Field Theory and Permutation Methods for the Statistical Analysis of MEG data ?pdf]
Neuroimage, 25(2):383-394, 2005Pascual-Marqui RD (2002)
Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002, 24 Suppl D:5-12Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC, Pantazis D, Leahy RM (2011)
Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2011, Article ID 879716, 13 pages, 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/879716Tadel F, Bock E, Niso G, Mosher JC, Cousineau M, Pantazis D, Leahy RM, Baillet S (2019)
MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm
Frontiers in Neuroscience, Feb 2019Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ (1997)
Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components
Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 35, 135–140