⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2018-05-16 14:23:42
2320
Comment:
|
1872
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
* ''TODO'' |
* Very clear and helpful explanations. * It was great. * ''I really would like to thank the organizers. Bravo.'' |
Line 8: | Line 8: |
Number of participants: 90<<BR>>Number of filled surveys: 20 | Number of participants: 60<<BR>>Number of filled surveys: 20 |
Line 12: | Line 12: |
* Never used: '''55%''' |
* Never used: '''55%''' |
Line 18: | Line 16: |
Line 24: | Line 21: |
* 5: 25% |
* 5: 25% |
Line 28: | Line 23: |
Line 35: | Line 29: |
* How was the pace of the presentation: | |
Line 36: | Line 31: |
1. |
* Way too slow: 0% * A bit too slow: 0% * Good pace: '''50%''' * A bit too fast: '''50%''' * Way too fast: 0% |
Line 39: | Line 37: |
* Yes: 75% * No: 25% |
* Yes: 25% * No: '''75%''' * If applicable, how would you rate the online tutorial: 1(worst) to 5(best) * 1: 0% * 2: 0% * 3: 22.2% * 4: '''44.4%''' * 5: 33.3% |
Line 61: | Line 65: |
== Comments and suggestions == The number indicates the number of participants who made similar comments. === Comments about the workshop === * Good clarity: 7 * Good pace: 11 * Sometimes too fast: 9 * Sometimes too slow: 2 * Two days would be better: 2 * More information about process options: 2 |
== Suggestions == |
Line 74: | Line 67: |
* Statistics: 4 * EEG topics: 3 * More information on source methods: 3 * Group analysis: 2 * Resting-state analysis: 2 * Cross-frequency coupling: 1 * Best practices: 1 * More time on data collection and registration: 1 * Epilespy: 1 * More connectivity methods: 1 * More scripting: 1 * Individual research question session: 1 |
* Explanation on experimental paradigm. * How to import data preprocessed with other software. |
Line 88: | Line 71: |
* Automated rejection of artifacts: 1 * PET and fMRI co-registration: 1 * Anatomy preprocessing: 1 * Conversion to EEGLAB / FieldTrip file formats: 1 * More advanced and customized graphing: 1 * Getting eye movement data from BDF files: 1 * Categorizing publications on the website: 1 * Single-trial analysis: 1 * More video tutorials: 1 |
* More time-series options for oscillatory patterns. |
Brainstorm workshop survey: Concordia 2018
Selected comments from attendees
- Very clear and helpful explanations.
- It was great.
I really would like to thank the organizers. Bravo.
Survey results
Number of participants: 60
Number of filled surveys: 20
Summary
- Before today's class, how would you describe your use of Brainstorm:
Never used: 55%
- Some simulation work: 5%
- Some experimental work: 35%
- Experienced user: 5%
- How helpful was the class in learning Brainstorm: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 20%
4: 55%
- 5: 25%
- How was the clarity of the presentation: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 15%
4: 50%
- 5: 35%
- How was the pace of the presentation:
- Way too slow: 0%
- A bit too slow: 0%
Good pace: 50%
A bit too fast: 50%
- Way too fast: 0%
- Did you try the online tutorial before coming to class:
- Yes: 25%
No: 75%
- If applicable, how would you rate the online tutorial: 1(worst) to 5(best)
- 1: 0%
- 2: 0%
- 3: 22.2%
4: 44.4%
- 5: 33.3%
- Interested in using Brainstorm for:
- EEG: 100%
- MEG: 35%
- MEG+EEG: 30%
- NIRS: 30%
- sEEG/ECoG: 10%
- Scripting: 15%
- Pre-processing: 25%
- Visualization of recordings: 25%
- Source analysis: 40%
- Time-frequency: 30%
- Functional connectivity: 30%
- Statistics: 20%
- Research: 30%
- Clinical applications: 5%
- Epilepsy: 20%
- Baby / infant studies: 5%
- Aging: 5%
Suggestions
Missing topics and requests
- Explanation on experimental paradigm.
- How to import data preprocessed with other software.
Missing tools in Brainstorm
- More time-series options for oscillatory patterns.